yes, he is not the problem but the symptom, imagine that his logic is still used against cold fusion.
this logic is exactly the opposite of what we pretend to teach to students. the same guys who bash cold fusion criticize pseudo science which use the same arguments... pathetic 2014-01-30 James Bowery <[email protected]>: > The individuals involved are not important. What is important are the > institutiosn that produce Huizenga's mentality in such abundance and > cultural dominance. > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:22 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> It is unfortunate that he did not live long enough to understand the >> damage he caused to the world by his vendetta against cold fusion. One, or >> perhaps two more years and we would have witnessed his mea culpa. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Alan Fletcher <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thu, Jan 30, 2014 4:08 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Huizenga dies >> >> NYT is stuck in 1999 >> >> John R. Huizenga, Physicist at Fore of Nuclear Era, Dies at 92 >> < >> http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/30/science/john-r-huizenga-physicist-at-fore-of-nuclear-era-dies-at-92.html?hpw&rref=obituaries> >> ; >> >> "It's as dead as ever," Dr. Huizenga told The New York >> Times<http://partners.nytimes.com/library/national/science/032399sci-cold-fusion.html>in >> an interview. "It's quite unbelievable that the thing has gone on for 10 >> years." >> > >
