Correction It is hard to tell what is going on if the electron is viewed realistically rather like a pin ball.
should read It is hard to tell what is going on if the electron is viewed realistically like a wave rather than like a pin ball. On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://phys.org/news/2011-10-physicists-unveil-theory-kind-superconductivity.html > > > > and another > > > > http://phys.org/news/2014-02-result-cheaper-efficient-solar-cells.html > > > > > > > > Electrons could become squeezed in that their quantum properties become > delocalized. An electron can be spread out all over the superconductor > because its location is pinned. > > > > It is hard to tell what is going on if the electron is viewed > realistically rather like a pin ball. > > > > The electron has over 500 modes of existence based on how these particles > move in relationship to each other, > > > > I adhere to the spin net emergence of the electron in that electrons and > light strings are the same thing with the electron being the tip of the > light string. > > > > Voltage is a description of the electron that is only applicable to a > particular state of electron matter. > > > > Voltage may not apply to all the ways that an electron can exist. It is > not clear that voltage can be applied to electrons in a superconductor; > especially when the type of superconductor is not defined. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:09 PM, John Berry <[email protected]> wrote: > >> While looking at reviews for Caver A. Mead's book, I read a review that >> said he made a mistake including voltage in a calculation for >> superconductors. >> >> Now I think that there must be voltage of a type in superconductors, >> there are 2 types of voltage. >> >> One is the voltage drop across a conductor. This is similar to the >> voltage on a charged capacitor. >> >> But there are other type is kinetic voltage, this is where a charge is >> moving at a given velocity as it used in particle accelerators. >> >> Voltage of this type can be compared to (or come from) inertia, and if >> electrons are moving then there will be some persistence even if impedance >> is removed since electrons still have mass. >> >> If a superconducting ring that carried a current was suddenly opened, the >> electrons are still moving and must compress slightly as they come to a >> stop leaving the ends momentarily charged to some degree. >> >> Additionally imagine a superconductive loop in an alternating EM field, >> there is a voltage induced by the changing magnetic field (or >> relativistically distorted electric field) and this does not lead to a >> voltage drop, but there is still a voltage, if this loop was opened and a >> normal circuit inserted you would indeed see a voltage. >> >> Indeed even if we use a resistive wire in such a loop, no voltage drop is >> noted, and yet there is still a voltage present to overcome the resistance, >> and the resistance is still impeding the flow of electrons. But would it be >> correct to say that this is happening with no voltage, even though none can >> be read by any instrument? >> >> >> John >> >> >> >
