Ah, I was thinking that since there are so few participants, and to reduce false positives, 2 images could be presented.
This way if they were able to feel something slight with one image that might have been in the mind but the other produced a clearly obvious energy/sensation, they could answer correctly. This could lead to a far better result, if someone is sensitive to energy they might well feel the energy that remains in the relatively inactive image. I have made an inactive version of the image I sent earlier, it required sabotaging every component and the energy is greatly reduced while still looking very similar to the other version. But I have not been able to get it to go away entirely. Additionally I have shared with people who are sensitive and they feel energy from the images, but they also feel energy from my emails. (I felt the same off one paragraph of a book when someone was writing about a company in Russia making pyramids and energy associated). Interestingly the Russian company makes and sells substances that have changed state in the pyramid as a way to connect to the energy in a more convenient manner. The problem is that if any unique pattern is formed in an energy field, it forms a connection to that energy. So I can't make an image with no energy, I can however make 2 similar looking images with very different (contrasting) energy activity levels. John On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:28 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > From Wikipedia's article on double blind > experiments<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_experiment#Double-blind_trials> > : > > "In a double-blind experiment, neither the participants nor the > researchers know which participants belong to the control group, as opposed > to the test group. Only after all data have been recorded (and in some > cases, analyzed) do the researchers learn which participants were which." > > This effect is almost an inevitable consequence of doing on-line testing > aka "AB testing <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A/B_testing>": > > The subject hits the experiment's URL. The server selects which treatment > is given to the subject (in this case, which image is presented to him). > Measurement of the results of the treatment are recorded by submitting a > response form (in this case, a simple "(Y) yeah I felt something I do not > attribute to my own psychology or (N) nah, i don't think I really felt > anything that was caused by anything but my psychology" > > The case is recorded as a database row. > > Later the researcher, who had no hand in selecting which images were > presented to which subjects nor even communicating with the subjects > anything but the conditions of the experiment, can analyze the data. > Better yet, outsiders can inspect the data and supply their own > interpretations. > > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:06 PM, John Berry <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ok, so have 2 images, one active and one inactive. >> >> See if people can establish which is which? >> >> Good idea, I will mock one up. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:01 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I believe I mentioned this before when you requested experimental >>> subjects: >>> >>> Its trivial to run double blind controls over the internet. Why don't >>> you? >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:15 AM, John Berry <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, some of you may remember that I designed images that I claim effect >>>> the background energy of space (aether, dark matter/energy, higgs field, >>>> quantum foam) to the point of being felt by most people. >>>> >>>> Some people have felt the energy and inquired about why they can feel >>>> something hitting them (in public places with it out of sight and no >>>> introduction). Hence it is not just in the mind. >>>> >>>> How can it possibly work? Because light is a terrahertz electric and >>>> magnetic field, all EM effects the medium that it is manifested in making >>>> it a little bit more solid, that which is involved in light is not as free >>>> to move as that which is darker. >>>> Actually in quantum terms, the light could be said to be collapsing the >>>> quantum wave function where it passes, but allowing a greater degree of >>>> wave function elsewhere. >>>> >>>> Last time some people on the list felt it, some didn't and not enough >>>> were willing to answer to be terribly clear which group was in the >>>> majority, but probably feelers by a slim majority. >>>> >>>> Anyway I have improved the 'tech' enough that I would be very grateful >>>> if any who didn't feel anything, or were unsure last time would give it >>>> another shot. >>>> And if you haven't tried before, please try it. >>>> >>>> http://imageshack.com/a/img577/8635/7w1a.png (feel over the image and >>>> the line to the top right shoots energy out the side of your monitor) >>>> >>>> The sensation can differ from normal sensation, sometimes I will >>>> encounter this energy without expecting to, but it seems to require intent >>>> other times, it seems to depend on how this type of energy (chi?) is going >>>> in your body. You may feel warmth, cool, motion, tingle or buzz or some >>>> indescribable difference. >>>> >>>> It can be very obvious or very subtle, and change for the person in >>>> either direction. >>>> Feel free to answer in private if you prefer. >>>> Please answer either way. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> John >>>> >>> >>> >> >
