emphasis will not be placed on basic research until something is shown which excites people. ***As much as I dislike agreeing with Blaze, he is right. The LENR MFMP gamma ray X-Prize proposal would spur research, excitement, industrial level investment, and much more.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]>wrote: > Edmund, you really need to watch the video. Swartz is claiming this is > exactly what he needs to do. Produce the Nanor so other people can use it > to scale up. > > My point is - emphasis will not be placed on basic research until > something is shown which excites people. Perhaps this is chicken and egg, > but I think if Nanor does what it claims to do, it's the egg that we need. > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Swartz is credible! However, such a small effect is not a credible >> support for investment in a working devoice. I did not make this clear. I >> hope it is clear now. If Swartz supplies devices that survive testing, >> this would be useful to basic research but not to a development study. My >> point is that we need emphasis placed on basic research. >> >> Ed Storms >> On Feb 10, 2014, at 4:50 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: >> >> 'Braze, you accept this claim based on a lecture by someone else and on >> only 4 mW of excess power?? *This is not a credible claim by any >> standard. '* >> >> OK, Thank you. You do not think Swartz is credible. Gotcha. Your >> input is useful, truly. It undermines my faith in him as well. But then >> there is the small matter of the association with the MIT professor who >> obviously thinks he is credible. >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Braze, you accept this claim based on a lecture by someone else and on >>> only 4 mW of excess power?? This is not a credible claim by any standard. >>> >>> Ed Storms >>> >>> On Feb 10, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: >>> >>> Watch at 2:38:00 >>> >>> He's reporting 27x gain and 4mW >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> ' >>>> >>>> >>>> - Swartz has optimized his nanor device to produce consistent, high >>>> lenr+ cop >>>> >>>> That is news to me. What is the COP and what conditions is the value >>>> based on? >>>> >>>> ' >>>> >>>> Have you watched this video? >>>> >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Al7NMQLvATo >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
