Oklahoma, Texas, Arkansas, Kansas The area of North Texas, Oklahoma, So. Kansas and Western Arkansas has had >3000 seismic events which jumped in 2009
Fracking has been going on for years and there does not seem to be a direct link but it may have some impact http://www.examiner.com/article/oklahoma-s-4-yr-long-quake-swarm-is-not-normal-and-it-ain-t-freakin-fracking On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > What three states? > > > > I'm thinking there could another factor not in evidence ... > > > > > > > > > > *From:* ChemE Stewart > > > > Any open minded guys here have any thoughts/ideas/theories on how the > installation of a Doppler microwave weather radar with the following specs > might trigger a ten-fold increase in seismic events/sonic booms within a 50 > mile radius of the tower for the past 3 years compared to the previous 10? > My p-Value stats over two years data says there is a correlation (which > does not prove causation) - I looked at 3 states of seismic data and approx > 30 radar locations > > > > · Operating frequency: 5510 MHz (C-band) > > o Wavelength: 5.44 cm > > o Pulse Length: 0.4, 0.8, 1.0, 2.0 µs > > o Pulse Repetition Frequency: 300-2000 Hz, 1 Hz step > > · *1 MW Peak Power (magnetron with solid-state modulator) * > > · 8.5-meter Andrew precision C-band dish > > o High angular resolution: 0.45 degrees @ -3 dB points > > o Gain: 50 dBi > > o Sidelobe Level: Better than -26 dB one-way > > o Cross-Pol: Better than -30 dB > > · Rotation rate: 6-25 deg/s under typical scanning (30 deg/s max) > > · Minimum Detectable Signal: -112 dBm > > o Radar Sensitivity: -15 dBZ at 50 km > > o Noise Figure: 3 dB > > · Simultaneous dual-polarization > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Nigel Dyer <l...@thedyers.org.uk> wrote: > > I also think it may be relevant to certain classes of LENR, particularly > the Graneau/Papp systems. Even low voltage systems may see localised very > high voltage differences as a result of back-emf effects when currents are > flowing between two surfaces that are initially in contact and are then > separated. > Nigel > > On 15/02/2014 21:54, Eric Walker wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:53 AM, <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> wrote: > > > > This effect is not very significant in chaotic plasmas, such as in a > Farnworth fusor device since there is too much field cancellation due to > random motion. It can be very large for plasma arc filaments, though. > > > > Is this a confirmed effect, or one that has been hypothesized? > > > > I'm reminded of my drawing of what I think might be going on in LENR, > where such an effect might be relevant: > > > > http://i.imgur.com/PoRGR7G.png > > > > (Also relevant in this model would be the accumulation of charge at the > left hand side, due to the blocking of the protons once they get to the > recess in the surface of the metal grain.) > > > > Eric > > > > > > >
