More...

The spin produced by slow light will also be squeezed. When the position of
the spin of slow light is highly confined, its magnitude will be
wide-ranging. For example, if the spin of a squeezed light packet averages
at 5 tesla, its fluctuation may amplify the maximum power that it can
produce in orders of magnitude by 10 or 20 times based on its slowness.

Coulomb barrier screening is directly related to the strength of the EMF
field which can grow very large when light is squeezed.


On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> How do we slow light down...we squeeze it. Even though this slow light is
> restricted in position, it is wide-ranging in momentum. Small optical
> cavities slow down light but in doing so, this squeezing makes it very
> potent in momentum.
>
>
>
> .
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:27 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> New Arxiv.org paper related to LENR -
>>
>> "Tunneling of slow quantum packets through the high Coulomb barrier"
>>
>> ABSTRACT:
>> We study the tunneling of slow quantum packets through a high Coulomb
>> barrier. We show that the transmission coefficient can be quite different
>> from the standard expression obtained in the plane wave (WKB)
>> approximation (and larger by many orders of magnitude), even if the
>> momentum dispersion is much smaller than the mean value of the momentum.
>>
>> http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.3837
>>
>> "Slow" packets here refer to relatively narrow packets whose center moves
>> at a relatively slow velocity.  Narrow wave packets can contain high
>> momentum components.
>>
>> I believe that the following 2013 presentation made by Allan Widom -
>>  "Electro-Weak and Electro-Strong Views of Nuclear Transmutations"
>>   
>> vglobale.it/public/files/2013/Cirps-Widom.pdfý<http://vglobale.it/public/files/2013/Cirps-Widom.pdf%C3%BD>
>> - points out a similar effect.
>> I.E, on slide 12 "Electron Mass Renormalization I"
>>
>> He notes that "Slowly Varying u(x) and Quickly Varying S(x)" can
>> represent an wave packet with much more energy than a simple observation
>> of its envelop "u(x)" would lead one to expect if its phase "S(x)" is
>> rapidly oscillating within the a slow (even almost static) envelop.
>>
>> -- Lou Pagnucco
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to