I am cool with robots, I see cool animations of future robots all the time,
like this one :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRzHaD5bg2s


On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:

>  Way cool video.
>
>
>
> The robots are solar powered as well. This is not all that "futuristic"
> IMO, but a near-term solution to cleaning mirrors - and probably another
> reason why Google hired Ray Kurzweil. Robots could be on-the-way for all we
> know, given the reputation of Google.
>
>
>
> I have to agree with Stewart on one point: that distributed power of any
> kind would be better, if it were feasible.
>
>
>
> However, photovoltaics are too expensive in the USA. LENR is about the
> only option that seems to work best as a distributed system, but will it be
> delayed?
>
>
>
> If LENR is delayed -perhaps the next step can be analyzed this way.
>
> 1)    When wind is available it is preferable and the lowest cost - go
> with VAWT first even for small installations.
>
> 2)    There are not many great wind sites, so distributed solar is not a
> bad choice but photovoltaics are still not a great option due to
> installation cost.
>
> 3)    Photovoltaic installation cost exceeds hardware cost in many places.
>
> 4)    Distributed solar thermal without steam - would be ideal if there
> was a good converter, and there is - but it isn't available yet. It could
> probably be self-installed, but that technology is not here.
>
> 5)    This free piston Stirling looks like the best of all non LENR
> solutions if it could be mass produced like an auto engine:
> http://www.qnergy.com/-overview
>
>
>
> *From:* Jed Rothwell
>
>
>
>   Show me the robots driving through that desert Jed, washing those
> 350,000 + mirrors.
>
>
>
> Here, let me Google that for you:
>
>
> Autonomous Electrostatic Heliostat Cleaning Robot
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMgW-VFvzRs
>
> There are many other robotic heliostat cleaners in arid and desert areas
> already in operation. They have been in operation for years.
>
>
>
> - Jed
>
>
>

Reply via email to