at this resonant frequency L-band frequencies of 1250 to 1350 MHz
As well as: - 1 MW peak power (magnetron with solid-state modulator) - Operating frequency is 5510 MHz (C-band) These power levels and frequencies are triggering an increase in sonic booms and shallow, weak "earthquakes" around the country, not just around Oklahoma City. They are charging up the atmosphere with their 24/7 pulses and the atmosphere is discharging energy back to the Earth (suddenly). A range of frequencies appears to work and a few megawatts triggers even more booms and quakes. I am totally serious (which only happens half the time) On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:15 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe this magnetron is energizing the vacuum component in the > atmosphere: > > http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/waves/magnetron.html > > > > The Magnetron > > The microwave > radiation<http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/ems2.html#c4> of > microwave ovens and some radar applications is produced by a device called > a magnetron. > > The magnetron is called a "crossed-field" device in the industry because > both > magnetic<http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/magfie.html#c1> > and > electric<http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elefie.html#c1>fields > are employed in its operation, and they are produced in perpendicular > directions so that they cross. The applied magnetic field is constant and > applied along the axis of the circular device illustrated. The power to the > device is applied to the center cathode which is heated to supply energetic > electrons which would, in the absence of the magnetic field, tend to move > radially outward to the ring anode which surrounds it. > > Electrons are released at the center hot cathode by the process of > thermionic emission and have an accelerating field which moves them outward > toward the anode. The axial magnetic field exerts amagnetic > force<http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/magint.html#c1> on > these charges which is perpendicular to their initially radial motion, and > they tend to be swept around the circle. In this way, work is done on the > charges and therefore energy from the power supply is given to them. As > these electrons sweep toward a point where there is excess negative charge, > that charge tends to be pushed back around the cavity, imparting energy to > the oscillation at the natural frequency of the cavity. This driven > oscillation of the charges around the cavities leads to radiation of > electromagnetic waves, the output of the magnetron. > Transport of energy by electromagnetic > wav<http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/waves/emwv.html#c2> > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Roarty, Francis X < > francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: > >> Axil, I am in total agreement with your first 5 paragraphs and I agree >> with where you are going but disagree that magnetism will increase or >> decrease particle production... even used in conjunction with nano geometry >> which restricts larger virtual particles in a casimir like manner the >> magnetism is only segregating the virtual particles between regions of >> various suppression.. I can see this providing a spatial bias to virtual >> particles that would unbalance the normal cancelation of random >> uncertainty.. perhaps a self assembled maxwellian demon of sorts. Would >> like to see if you can still put your theory forward without relying on a >> breach of the isotropy or at least stipulating that the breach is a >> function of the geometry which your magnetism is leveraging somehow. >> >> Regards >> >> Fran >> >> >> >> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 26, 2014 3:04 PM >> *To:* vortex-l >> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Progress to date >> >> >> >> The following post is a synthesis of a number of individual and >> disjointed posts that I have produced in recent months to make sense of a >> complicated issue. That issue is the confusion incipient in the vast >> differences and contradictions seen in a wide variety of LENR systems. >> >> >> From system to system, LENR is subject to a variation of strength. To my >> way of thinking, this variability in the characterization of the unique mix >> and match LENR processes instantiated in each LENR system are directly >> based on the strengths of magnetic fields inherent in each LENR system. >> >> Magnetic fields interact with the vacuum and produce a number of >> different breakdown mechanisms as a function of that field's strength. >> >> To start this detailing, virtual particle production in the vacuum is one >> of the sources of the uncertainty in quantum mechanics as particles come >> randomly into and out of existence. Tunneling and radioactivity is a result >> of this vacuum based uncertainty. >> >> Magnetic fields interact with the vacuum to produce particles in a >> deterministic way. As the strength of the magnetic fields increase, the >> probability that the vacuum will generate particles will also increase. >> This increase particle production in the vacuum increases the rates of >> tunneling and radioactivity. >> >> >> As the magnetic field gains strength to intermediate levels, the vacuum >> produces composite particles from fermions. The magnetic field interacts >> with the various types of fermions to catalyze virtual charge carrying >> quasi-particle pairs that are bound to the fermions as the fermions >> attempts to minimize its particular energy level. >> >> As the magnetic field reaches it maximum strength, this field produces >> mesons out of the vacuum which effectively guaranties nuclear disruption in >> terms of charge screening, cluster fusion, fission, and isotope and >> radioactivity stabilization >> >> >> In summary, a single primary magnetic field based causation produces >> strength based mix and match results centered on a hierarchy of >> magnetically catalyzed vacuum based particle production mechanisms. >> > >
