Designing those nano-hairs on the micro-particles are at the heart of the success of the NiH reactor. Rossi said he spent 6 months of day and night experimental effort to optimize his nano-hairs. Give DGT credit for coming up with a workable nano-hair design.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > *From:* Bob Cook > > > > Is there any available knowledge of the structure of the Ni nano > particles Rossi is rumored to use? > > > > There are past posts in the archive which have speculated on his tubules > or tubercles, but it may be counterproductive to try to deconstruct Rossi. > He hints at buying his special nickel from a Hobbit in Italy, and magic > many be involved. J > > > > It would probably be more productive to come at this from the standpoint > of adding something to CNT instead of subtracting something from nickel. > > > > Nickel chloride is interesting in this regard, since it is soluble and > since chlorine has special energetic properties of its own - when > irradiated with light. > > > > In connecting all the dots in a hypothetical nanotube reactor, "ring > current" in hexagonal carbon structures, together with SPP may work > together with CNT in water to provide LENR effects. These CNT would > function as nano electron accelerators when magnetized. We are avoiding > mention of the ultimate source of excess energy for now to focus on the > electrons. Heavy water is probably not required. > > > > There is no proof of any of this - but in the event that anyone should see > photons in the keV range as a characteristic of any CNT device, especially > one operating in water - then this provides a plausible explanation of how > that finding is related back to the basic hexagonal bond-length of CNT, > about 0.142 nm and how bremsstrahlung at low energy (around 1 keV) could > provide the feedback mechanism for the SPP. It all fits, proof or no. > > > > One further detail to add, especially in the context of the Cooper patent > application: Cherenkov radiation vs. bremsstrahlung - in the above > suggestion for the required feedback mechanism. SPP requires an intense > light source and the initial electrons could, ironically, be too energetic. > > > > Cherenkov radiation is emitted when a charged particle such as an electron > passes through a dielectric medium (water) at a speed greater than the > phase velocity of light in that medium. It should be noted that Cherenkov > radiation is differentiated from bremsstrahlung radiation because the > intensity does not depend on the mass of the particle, whereas > bremsstrahlung does. However, the threshold for electrons is around 250 keV > which would seem to eliminate this kind of radiation in CNT cells (since it > would show up independently). Is there a correlate? > > > > Probably. The characteristic blue glow of nuclear fuel storage is due to > Cherenkov radiation, but there are other types of fluorescence in which > electrons create a similar light source differently. Therefore, and since > SPP depends on a light source and 1 keV electrons are possibly resonant, > there could be something happening with water fluorescence similar to > Cherenkov but NOT identical. It is probably related to FRET (Forster > resonant energy transfer) instead of phase velocity. A blue glow comes from > the Lyman line of hydrogen in any case. > > > > The bottom line is that if SPP are involved in CNT, and in the simple > device described in the Cooper patent - then the experimenter should be > able to see a characteristic visible fluorescence for a period of time > after the input power is turned off and it could be more energetic photons > than the input. For instance, if sodium vapor lighting is used as input, > the afterglow could be in the blue spectrum and it were the Lyman line, > this would actually be more convincing than helium and far easier to > document. > > > > Apparently the helium measurement of the Cooper disclosure does not stand > up to close scrutiny. It is not the only way to go. This kind of CNT > reactor can be done with light water and an electrolyte in a partial > replication which is only going for fluorescence, a hydrogen line and > afterglow (and possibly crude water bath calorimetry). > > > > Jones > > > > > > > >
