Stefan,
I think Jan Naudts nailed it with his 05 paper describing the hydrino as
relativistic hydrogen.. the fractional orbitals are actually Lorentzian
contraction along a single axis from the perspective of the hydrino looking out
at us in the distance.. We outside the active geometry seem to slow down in the
same way as the Paradox twin approaching C appears to slow down from our
stationary perpective.. the nano Ni geometry opposes longer wavelength of
virtual particles which, if we apply Naudts solution for the hydrino, would
suggest the full wavelengths still occupy this suppressed region by altering
space-time. A smaller dimension of time to free up more space while keeping a
constant 4d volume. Where near C velocity shrinks one spatial axis due to the
Pythagorean relationship between V^2 and C^2 and slows time, the suppression of
longer vacuum wavelengths by nano geometry shrinks instead the time axis to
"create" more space in its local frame.. we never see it because the orbital
appears to contract from our perspective.. note the isotropy we consider
"stationary" in our macro world correlates to a certain vacuum density which
can be broken by the suppression of longer wavelengths by nano geometry - We
know that the inverse of boundary spacing cubed can trumps gravity's square law
once boundary separation approaches the lower nano range. I think the nice
fractional steps of the hydrino are simply the same preferred orbital levels we
see in 3d translated to another axis.
I think you are already aware that skeletal cat geometry and
nano powder geometry are essentially the same even though one is a leached out
of solid and the other formed by bulk packing arrangement of individual grains.
Fran
From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 11:14 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:If and only if
I've continue to read about Randy Mill's theory. What struck me us not shown to
enough detail is if the hydrino states are physically attainable. It is clear
that any such state should not have a solution that radiates, but given a
mathematical state that does not radiate, it can be in such a state that any
disturbance of it will radiate and take it further away and then increase the
radiation an boom, off goes the electron in radiation this would mean that it
is impossible to push an electron to this state. To really understand I would
think that a physical model of the charge distribution needs to be in place,
not just an add hoc charge field. This charge field must be a result of a
nonlinear term in the Maxwell's equations and a search for that physics can
probably be guided by understanding why QM and Mill's theory tell the same
story.
Cheers!
