John So true! "Einstein considered General Relativity to be unthinkable without an aether." But he did it anyway now didn't he?
It would be nice to get her to come debate, but it would appear she's unwilling to risk a large reality change. A lot of work would be invalidated, careers undone, etc... if the aether were proven to be true, so don't hold your breath there friend. Gibson ________________________________ From: John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2014 11:34 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Disproofs of Relativity Einstein considered General Relativity to be unthinkable without an aether. On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: Unfortunately, she said she is "more focused on General Relativity (gravity as geometry or the warping of space/time) than Special Relativity and therefore have little use for aether theories." > > > >On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:04 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: > >Kevin stated: >>“I'm debating someone elsewhere and she is not only unconvinced, she's far >>smarter and better educated than I am.” >> >>Well invite the young lady into the dime-box saloon!! The place could use >>some female energy… >>J >> >>-mark >> >>From:Kevin O'Malley [mailto:kevmol...@gmail.com] >>Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 4:28 PM >>To: vortex-l >> >>Subject: Re: [Vo]:Disproofs of Relativity >> >> >>John: >>Do you have a citation for all these "many findings"? I'm debating someone >>elsewhere and she is not only unconvinced, she's far smarter and better >>educated than I am. >> >>On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:24 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>Special Relativity has made the assumption that the speed of light is >>constant, this is despite many findings otherwise. >> >> >
