Most LENR researchers use static NAE in their systems. Examples of static NAE are those cracks produced hydrogen loading.
When NAE hot spots are produced through a dynamic mechanism as they are required to keep the reaction going. NAE destruction does not kill the reaction over time. In a dynamic NAE system, NAE creation exactly matches NAE destruction. In more advanced systems capable of producing NAEs as an ongoing process, computer automation control can signal when NAEs are reduced in numbers below reaction specification and a activation of a plasma based dust production process rebuilds the NAE population. Think of NAE's as lumps of coal fed into a coal fire by a temperature controlled stoker. Lowering temperatures cause a thermostatic process to fed more coal lumps into the coal fire. Such a dynamic NAE system can run for years without degradation in performance. On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > It strikes me that as so many LENR researchers tried to scale up their > results, they have failed. That would seem to suggest that higher > temperatures kill the LENR effect, which favors BEC formation theories. \\\ > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Jones: >> Using your later input, how about the 1DLEC, pronounced OneDellECK. >> >> 1 Dimensional Luttinger Electron Condensate >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> *From:* Kevin O'Malley >>> >>> >>> >>> What I call the Vibrating 1Dimensional Luttinger Liquid Bose-Einstein >>> Condensate , the V1DLLBEC. >>> >>> >>> >>> We gotta think up a better name, especially if it will include solids. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
