Entrants should alert FQXi with information if they witness such activities. ***Then you should probably alert them, to keep your effort above the noise of suspicion.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>wrote: > Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > > You're featured at Cold Fusion Now >> >> >> http://coldfusionnow.org/read-and-rate-cold-fusion-may-have-revolutionary-potential-by-jed-rothwell/ >> > > Another clique! This appears to be against the rules: > > FQXi expects those providing community evaluations to do so based solely > on the quality of the essay assessed. Voting collusion or bartering, mass > down-voting, and other such forms of 'voter fraud' will not be tolerated, > and participants in such will have (all) their votes discarded or in > extreme cases their essays disqualified. Entrants should alert FQXi with > information if they witness such activities. > > - Jed > >
