The hypothesis that I would like to see tested in the water cluster theory
of cavitation. This idea goes as follows: Cavitation produces water
clusters of H2O, H, and O atoms in various configurations

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_cluster

Evanescent *surface plasmon polariton*  nano - reactions will then produce
over unity heat generation in the cat converter.

If the solutions of water clusters are pre prepared via
cavitation, addition types of nano-particles can be included in the colloid
that from which the HHO is generated. Potassium carbonate would be a good
addition to that colloid.

Different nano-particle combination colloid mixtures could be tested
that vary in particle micro/nano size and/or chemical composition; for
example, single and multiple wall carbon nanotubes, and Bucky balls are a
must to try.










On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:

>  *From:* Jed Rothwell
>
>
>
> That is great! I have been thinking for a long time that catalytic
> converts should be used in cold fusion. They are engineered to be robust,
> and to expose all of the catalytic metal to the gas.
>
> Off the shelf hydrogen filters have been used to good effect. Hydrogen
> filter palladium is engineered to be robust. In this case, to withstand
> high loading without cracking.
>
>
>
> If the gain is really from LENR then it makes more sense to use hydrogen
> from a tank - there is no need for electrolysis and the risk of explosion
> from HHO. And no need for a very expensive hydrogen filter. And no need for
> oxygen either.
>
>
>
> Of course, many of the proponents think that HHO as a mixed gas is more
> potent than is the same amount of H2 from a tank, but that is not proved.
>
>
>
> A meaningful experiment to test for LENR would be an Arata - Cravens type
> of unpowered experiment with low pressure hydrogen filing a sealed
> catalytic converter (flushed of air so no combustion).
>
>
>
> Do you get a small temperature gain with no power input?
>
>
>
> Based on Cravens demo, there could be a significant thermal gain given the
> very large amount of catalyst in contact with H2.
>
>
>

Reply via email to