Thank you for the link. Not having the full understanding of nuclear physics, QM, chemistry etc. this video made a lot of sense. A combination of the findings between many people and the inside reports a la Mats Lewan will bring the technology forward. There is still a need for a few ingredients to make this soup taste well. 1. Progress requires a structure to work within. I think very simple organizations with minimum overhead but contribution from all disciplines (Leadership, marketing, engineering etc.) is required. 2. The debate must not be personal. I.E. the discussion about Jed Rothwell's character (ugly). (In my opinion Jed brought up a genuine reason to disbelieve the business qualities of DFK. The only thing that would mitigate that would be examples of the opposite behavior from DFK.) We need to accept different opinions and wait to attack them until new / invalidating information is available to deny them having a chance to be correct. Why take a firm stance. It does not pay and it does not solve anything. All it does is to make one look stupid when ones firm statement was wrong. Regarding LENR I think it is entering a 'vortex' situation and in the bottom of that spiral a reasonable explanation will appear. A finite number of ideas are on the table and an approach trying to eliminate the differences is under way. I hope the COP is great enough. 3. An openness to share information. Dr. Ahem gave a lot of information and I think Dr. Storms did as well (he is missed here). Most of the information shared will not impact the result either from an academical or business point of view. It is not a zero sum game. If some one is spinning his wheels searching for answers already available it does not propel LENR forward (the opposite obviously) and it does not give advantages to the one with the know how, all it does it depletes available funds (which are considered the biggest obstacle) faster. I do recommend the video.
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/follow/powder-test-cells/368-dr-brian-s-ahern-adds-significant-strength-to-the-mfmp It brings a lot of ideas forward without condemning other ideas, critic them yes but not ridicule them. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 6140 Horseshoe Bar Road Suite G, Loomis CA 95650 "Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort." PJM On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 5:48 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > Interesting comments about the magical range of 3 -12 nm particles & the > importance of magnetism. > > See the linked video in the piece. > > > > http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/follow/powder-test-cells/368-dr-brian-s-ahern-adds-significant-strength-to-the-mfmp > > >
