Axil--

You do not mean to coat the surface of the Ni nano particles themselves do you? 
 It seems only the inner surface of the reactor vessel which is a small 
pressure vessel, rather than the  nano particles should be coated.    However, 
it may be desirable to transmit the infrared across the reactor vessel wall to 
the external coolant to effect better heat transfer.    

One other suggestion is in order to achieve the size control of the Ni nano 
particles, developers should consider ball milling Ni in a cryogenic ball 
milling machine using N  ( maybe liquid H) as the liquid in the process.  The N 
(and potentially H) will coat every small particle with a thin--one or two atom 
layer-- of N (or H)  during the process and assures that particles do not 
agglomerate during the milling process.  Better size uniformity will likely be 
accomplished in the process.  Cost effectiveness for production of nano Ni in 
house  may be significant.  The Ni particle surface resulting may be more 
active for LENR.   The loading of the reactor vessel could be accomplished as a 
slurry of liquid N or H as the case may be with a warming period to evaporate 
the N or H.   For a H slurry loading of the reactor could be accomplished in 
the same warming operation as the H turns to a gas.   (Liquid N would be safer 
and cheaper to use than liquid H in the milling operation.)  

Lastly the homogeneous distribution of any catalyst could effectively be 
accomplished during the milling operation, which effectively mixes all 
constituents in the machine.  The coating of each particle as it is attrited in 
the operation is significant in achieving a homogeneous mixture, if this is 
desirable.     

Development would be necessary to make sure the ball milling operation, as it 
is perfected, produces nano size particles of the correct dimensions and mixed 
catalysts as desired.  Whatever milling balls are selected they should be very 
hard compared to the Ni or catalyst being attrited.  For example Haynes-25 
cobalt  alloy balls may be warranted.  

Bob.   
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Axil Axil 
  To: vortex-l 
  Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 11:37 PM
  Subject: [Vo]:a tip for Ni/H developers


  http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1202/1202.6603.pdf



  Ultra-Thin Metal Films for Enhanced Solar Absorption



  To optimize photonic responsiveness, one of the reasons that nickel is a 
great LENR material is that it is an ideal reflector of light, specifically 
infrared light.



  Furthermore, the ideal thin film thickness of nickel to optimize optical 
performance is between 10nm and 13 nm. 



  All surface on your Ni/H reactor should be coated with a nickel thin film 
whose thinness is between 10nm and 13 nm.

Reply via email to