dear Axil, about my friendly dispute with Freeman Dyson please see my essay:
http://fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/Gluck_essay.gluck1.pdf "Then, in 2004 a great scientist has formulated the idea of interestingness in a bright way: "I propose that our universe is the most interesting of all possible universes, and our fate as human beings is to make it so." [1] By a friendly discussion on the Internet with Freeman Dyson, we could state that we have discovered this idea independently, I have used secular thinking while he has used his religious vision of the world. This exchange has reinforced my conviction that interestingness s fundamental and I have the task to investigate both its high level significance and applications in human existence. Science and spirituality are converging in the idea that an endlessly interesting world is a huge creative opportunity for Humanity to build a great future. The path to practical applications is a tortuous „obstacled‟ way. Uncertainty of/in science is also related to the idea of Pareto truths. Peter On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/148014458%3Fsecret_token%3Ds-7fDb7&color=0066cc&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_artwork=true > > Physics Legend Freeman Dyson On The One Thing We Just Don't Get About > Science (PODCAST) > > > The whole point of science is that most of it is uncertain. That's why > science is exciting--because we don't know. Science is all about things we > don't understand. The public, of course, imagines science is just a set of > facts. But it's not. Science is a process of exploring, which is always > partial. We explore, and we find out things that we understand. We find out > things we thought we understood were wrong. That's how it makes progress. > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
