I would not write them off too quickly. They had NASA over (not formally confirmed I believe) and NASA seems to be quite convinced LENR has revived in a serious way. Maybe Rossi was visited too. Defkalion's weak point is bad engineering. This can be resolved.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]>wrote: > If you see greentech, or Internet companies, it is not so different. > the problem is that it is much more tolerated and ignored for mainstream > and fashion technologies than for lenr. > > even good startup with good technologies crash most of the time > > > 2014-05-14 6:26 GMT+02:00 Eric Walker <[email protected]>: > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We have to be careful. >>> >> >> Without regard to DGT, specifically, I think there is a recurring lesson >> here. In the LENR and free energy fields, more than any other fields I >> have followed, there is a certain type of amped-up businessman who belongs >> in a late-night infomercial but instead makes wacky claims somewhere on the >> Internet. Whether you would call what they're doing fraud or not probably >> depends in part upon the mindset and intention of the people, if any, who >> have given them money. In this context it is something of a miracle that >> Rossi's work has stood out as likely being genuine and have not simply >> blended into the background. The LENR researchers, too, on the whole, do >> not fit this pattern, although some of them are obviously credulous. A few >> of them do appear to be infomercial salesmen as well. >> >> Even when people seem credible and genuine, it is good to follow up and >> ask for some data to support what they're saying. >> >> Eric >> >> >
