possible. I hope it. But they promised so much. Better enjoy surprise or quietness.
2014-05-15 17:32 GMT+02:00 Brad Lowe <[email protected]>: > My Defkalion confidence goes up and down like the tides. > > Has anyone asked Dr. Kim to explain his roll in testing the reactors-- > whose test equipment, number of runs, did he have access to the > reactor, how many days, his confidence level, and what he can attest > to publicly. > > It sounds like DGT wants to be able to use Kim's involvement in the > tests as a kind of product endorsement. Is Dr. Kim still working full > time at Purdue and is he actively persuing LENR research? Surely, > someone on this list can drop him an email and let him know his > character is being questioned. > https://www.physics.purdue.edu/people/faculty/yekim.shtml > > There may be an R6 Defkalion demo within 6 months. Peter Gluck says > that MFMP may be invited to observe and measure. > http://www.drboblog.com/dr-bob-transylvania/ > > Jed, would you mind getting clarification from your sources to address > Daniel's "claims"? > > - Brad > > > > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:11 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > It appears that everyone that had anything to do with DGT will be > tainted by > > this unfortunate chapter in the book of cold fusion. I admit that I had > > great hopes for them despite the mounting evidence against their actually > > having a functioning product. > > > > Perhaps future developments will be forthcoming that will salvage their > > company reputation but that latest report suggests otherwise. Is it > time to > > move on and be more discerning in the future regarding trust before > careful > > verification? > > > > This is a tough blow to accept. Time for a stiff drink. > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tue, May 13, 2014 3:24 pm > > Subject: [Vo]:Sources: Kim did not examine Defkalion reactor > > > > Regarding Dr. Yeong E. Kim and his theory about Defkalion's reactor > > > > I have heard from two reliable sources that Kim based his theory papers > on > > information provided to him by Defkalion. Defkalion "would not let Kim > get > > close" to a reactor. One source says: "They only provided him with data > that > > they claimed was from experiments. Dr. Kim based all of his observations > and > > writings on what DKG provided." > > > > He did not perform his own measurements at all. > > > > > > As I said, my sources say Kim was barred from accessing the machine. I > guess > > it is possible he never asked to take measurements, or he did not want > to. > > Either way, he looks bad. > > > > If he did not want to make measurements, that is irresponsible. If he is > not > > good at hands-on experiments he should have brought along a grad > student. Or > > he should have written in the paper: "This is based on data provided by > > Defkalion. The author has not observed the machine in operation or taken > any > > data." > > > > If he did want to take measurements, but they refused to let him, he > should > > have packed his bags, gone home, and reported they are a bunch of frauds. > > > > - Jed > > > >
