Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: DGT was producing steam, not 212 water. >
They were producing a little steam because there was no water flowing into the cell. > The change of state energy from water to steam was not reflected in the > COP calculations. Yes this is inaccurate, but gross under estimate of the > COP. > That would only be true if the flow is correct. Or partially correct. When you adjust for a much lower flow rate, or no flow at all, then the steam does not indicate any excess heat, any more than steam from a pot of water on an electric stove proves there is an anomaly. > Jed, you are whipping yourselfer into a frenzy of recombination. > Well, at least recombination is appropriate for this field. > Such a negative position will damage your reputation if DGT does have > something that you say they don't. > If they have something and they publish it, of course I will agree it is real. As long as they publish nothing I am justified in saying "as far as I know they have nothing." > A charge of bad judgment might be leveled upon DGT success. > Since they have not published any evidence of success, no one can blame me for concluding they have had no success. I do not have ESP. - Jed
