I believe they did have complete control. I have heard they improved the electric power input measurement, which was the weakest part of the first set of tests, in my opinion.
The only thing they weren't able to do was actually open the device right? Did they have control of input or just any measurements they wanted to make on it? I believe they did have complete control. I have heard they improved the electric power input measurement, which was the weakest part of the first set of tests, in my opinion. I can't argue with this really. On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: > > Probably nothing. If they turn out to have had complete control over the >> device (i.e. Rossi sold his IP & IH might allow it to be cracked), and >> produced the same results, that might be something. >> > > I believe they did have complete control. I have heard they improved the > electric power input measurement, which was the weakest part of the first > set of tests, in my opinion. > > I have no idea what the results are. (I would not reveal them even if I > knew.) > > > If any black-box component remains, skeptics will not believe it. >> > > Skeptics will not believe anything under any circumstances. Not until > *Nature* magazine and the DoE give them permission to believe. Then they > will rewrite history to say the believed all along. > > - Jed > >
