the difference is that it needed no instrument to be observed (levitation), and that physicist have replicated it, and not only chemist...
The tragedy of LENr is that is chemistry experiment, indirectly measured through invisible characteristic needing confidence in instruments and computation (balance), and that physicist thinks it is their business because it is nuclear. since they say it is not nuclear, they should let the chemist decide. most chemist decided that their funding and career did not deserve to be ruined for that and they kept silent (because they were not enough incompetent and crook to support the deliria of taubes/Huizenga/Parks/Lewis/hansen/Morrison and their parrots)... except few irrational=honest chemist ruined their career ands lost their funding. 2014-06-15 6:45 GMT+02:00 Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>: > And yet, there is still no established HTSC theory. Using the reasoning > that has been applied to LENR... therefore, HTSC must not exist. > > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> http://www.superconductors.org/News.htm >> >> I am please to be the first to post that Superconductors.ORG reports >> high Tc has been advanced to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K) >> > >
