Axil, I am sure it is my lack of understanding. However, I cannot see why it is so hard to measure input and output of the Ecat.
I am fine receiving a correction of my simple thinking as I am sure I am missing something. I do not know anything about the RF situation and if I had the thought (or experience) thereof I would put my watt-meter or volt-meter and ampere-meter at distance from the Ecat. That way I would have guaranteed good data for my incoming energy. I understand there are many ways to measure the output. To be sure and to be simple I would take a cooling liquid and with a simple temperature probe make sure that outgoing coolant from the Ecat was constant (a simple regulator to regulate the flow of coolant). Then it seems straight forward to me to measure temperature difference and amount of coolant being used to keep the temperature even at the Ecat. It seems simple to me so I probably do not see the issues. The Rf issue can be solved I am sure with not too much headache if all measurement take place at a distance from the Ecat, screening? Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > One of the challenges that the testers of the Rossi reactor will have will > be the intense EMF that radiates from the reactor. > > Due to NMR effects, this EMF radiation will blow out the instrumentation > and communication equipment within some meters of the reactor. The Reactor > might take out the phone system in the test location. Measurement using > direct wire connections to the reactor might be affected. This may have > been the reason for the laser temperature measurement process undertaken in > the last reactor test. > > Testing the NiH reactor will be a real challenge due to its tremendous > capacity to produce RF radiation. > > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> E-Cat world reporting another delay from the TIP testers... "early autumn" >> "Soon we will probably know a little bit more. The group of scientists >> from >> Uppsala and KTH has expanded with more scientists from other countries and >> the second independent test is about to get published early autumn. The >> test >> has been going on for months on neutral premises in Lugano, >> Switzerland..." >> >> ... sounding like a scratched vinyl record >> >> >