One of the most amazing LENR systems of them all is the Cravens golden ball system. It is so energy weak, relatively cool, small scale, and gentle that it is hard to imagine its energy is derived from nuclear processes.
I believe that this system shows the probabilistic quantum mechanical nature of the LENR nuclear reaction. Low heat level implies a minuscule nuclear reaction rate in the Craven’s ball. This shows that a LENR system does not need to achieve a high transition point to produce energy. If a tipping point is occurring, it is localized down at the nano-level of even the at the nuclear level. The magnetic field that drives the Craven system is produced by magnet dust. This field strength is very weak and could be found ubiquitously in everyday life. The LENR reaction behaves probabilistically like quantum mechanical tunneling where LENR is always possible even when the energy involved is very feeble and well below any possibly expected threshold. On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > "Symmetry breaking" is a theoretical phenomenon where there are small > fluctuations acting on a formative system crossing into a critical "tipping > point." The often-invisible influences will decide the whole system's fate > by determining which branch of a bifurcation is taken. > > Symmetry breaking can be a critical factor for LENR theory in the context > of > CoE - even if the bifurcation is hidden and even if the branch which is > taken is the one of extreme low probability. Moreover, the "fluctuation" > which is responsible can look like "noise." In fact, the term "butterfly > effect" of Chaos theory, is related to this phenomenon. > > One of the most unusual and counter-productive chapters of LENR history > relates to "Breaking Symmetry" the movie by Keith Johnson, who was a > brilliant MIT researcher before somehow believing that he was a budding > Howard Hughes film impresario. The film was a complete failure, and a > gigantic waste of resources in the context of LENR... except for the title > ... which deserves more comment in the context of Noether. It is hard to > rationalize this as anything but silly. > http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1437885/ > > The symmetry breaking process for LENR comes into focus when the small > transitions, the "noise" of the system, is effectively nonrandom, but looks > random. The directed noise will transition a large conservative system from > a disorderly state into an ordered states with anomalous energy in some > cases. It is a very complex situation, and part of the understanding, or > lack thereof, goes back to Noether's theory undermining Conservation of > Energy; and to what is really the inverse of this theory. > > For name-phreaks, Noether is a most curious surname - being "no-ether" in a > naïve and incorrect way, since the correct German pronunciation is > completely unrelated to the written associations, which developed later > with > the concept of ether/aether. > > More on this curious chapter of LENR later. > > We can call it the "yes-ether" theory (Yaether ?), to the extent that > Dirac's sea is the ether and the gateway to it involves breaking symmetry, > possibly through application of nanomagnetism. > > Jones > >
