What Mills has not done is show how hydrinos can form a galaxy sized soliton that is produced by a Bose Einstein condensate (BEC) hundreds or thousands of light years across. This dark matter behavior has been observed in the collision of galaxies. This BEC cannot be one of those wimpy low temperature near zero kelvin BECs since the dark matter mechanism must be energetic enough to also produce XUV; 400% more than expected.
So dark matter must be polaritons http://arxiv.org/pdf/0805.3827.pdf BEC dark matter can explain collisions of galaxy clusters <snip> we have reinterpreted cold dark matter as a Bose-Einstein condensate". So, "the ultra-light bosons forming the condensate share the same quantum wave function, so disturbance patterns are formed on astronomic scales in the form of large-scale waves". Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2014-07-reinterpreting-dark.html#jCp <End snip> Why invent a new particle when polaritons can fit all the requirements of dark matter. One thing that this idea will imply is that light gains mass when it becomes entangled with electrons. Light and electrons could be entangled on a cosmological large scale to form a polariton BEC soliton much as they do in LENR. Polaritons are supposed to be almost massless forming bosons, but are they? The charge of the polaritons could be delocalized to make polariton dark matter non interacting. In NiH reactor will be a great test bed to explore the polariton BEC in understanding dark matter cosmology more deeply. On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 11:29 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sat, 12 Jul 2014 19:21:07 -0400: > Hi, > > > They're obviously seeing XUV from Hydrino production in free space. ;) > (If the dark matter is Hydrinos's as Mills claims, then disproportionation > reactions should produce XUV.) > > > >On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 7:03 PM, H Veeder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> CU-Boulder instrument onboard Hubble reveals the universe is ‘missing’ > >> light > >> > >> http://tinyurl.com/qzs4rjo > >> > >> July 9, 2014 • > >> > >> Something is amiss in the universe. There appears to be an enormous > >> deficit of ultraviolet light in the cosmic budget. > >> > >> Observations made by the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph, a $70 million > >> instrument designed by the University of Colorado Boulder and installed > on > >> the Hubble Space Telescope, have revealed that the universe is > “missing” a > >> large amount of light. > >> > >> “It’s as if you’re in a big, brightly lit room, but you look around and > >> see only a few 40-watt lightbulbs,” said the Carnegie Institution for > >> Science’s Juna Kollmeier, lead author of a new study on the missing > light > >> published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters. “Where is all that light > >> coming from? It’s missing from our census.” > >> > >> The research team—which includes Benjamin Oppenheimer and Charles > Danforth > >> of CU-Boulder’s Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy—analyzed the > >> tendrils of hydrogen that bridge the vast reaches of empty space between > >> galaxies. When hydrogen atoms are struck by highly energetic ultraviolet > >> light, they are transformed from electrically neutral atoms to charged > ions. > >> > >> The astronomers were surprised when they found far more hydrogen ions > than > >> could be explained with the known ultraviolet light in the universe, > which > >> comes primarily from quasars. The difference is a stunning 400 percent. > >> > >> Strangely, this mismatch only appears in the nearby, relatively > >> well-studied cosmos. When telescopes focus on galaxies billions of light > >> years away—which shows astronomers what was happening when the universe > was > >> young—everything seems to add up. The fact that the accounting of light > >> needed to ionize hydrogen works in the early universe but falls apart > >> locally has scientists puzzled. > >> > >> The mismatch emerged from comparing supercomputer simulations of > >> intergalactic gas to the most recent analysis of observations from the > >> Cosmic Origins Spectrograph. > >> > >> “The simulations fit the data beautifully in the early universe, and > they > >> fit the local data beautifully if we’re allowed to assume that this > extra > >> light is really there,” said CU-Boulder’s Oppenheimer. “It’s possible > the > >> simulations do not reflect reality, which by itself would be a surprise, > >> because intergalactic hydrogen is the component of the universe that we > >> think we understand the best.” > >> > >> The type of light that is energetic enough to turn neutral hydrogen into > >> hydrogen ions is called “ionizing photons” and is known to come from > only > >> two sources in the universe: quasars, which are powered by hot gas > falling > >> onto supermassive black holes over a million times the mass of the sun, > and > >> the hottest young stars. Observations indicate that the ionizing photons > >> from young stars are almost always absorbed by gas in their host > galaxy, so > >> they never escape to affect intergalactic hydrogen. But the number of > known > >> quasars is far lower than needed to produce the amount of light > necessary > >> to create the quantity of hydrogen ions measured by the research team. > >> > >> > >> “If we count up the known sources of ultraviolet ionizing photons, we > come > >> up five times too short,” Oppenheimer said. “We are missing 80 percent > of > >> the ionizing photons, and the question is where are they coming from? > The > >> most fascinating possibility is that an exotic new source, not quasars > or > >> galaxies, is responsible for the missing photons.” > >> > >> For example, the mysterious dark matter, which holds galaxies together > but > >> has never been seen directly, could itself decay and ultimately be > >> responsible for this extra light. > >> > >> “The great thing about a 400 percent discrepancy is that you know > >> something is really wrong,” said co-author David Weinberg of Ohio State > >> University. “We still don't know for sure what it is, but at least one > >> thing we thought we knew about the present day universe isn’t true.” > >> > >> Other co-authors on the study are Francesco Haardt of the Università > >> dell’Insubria, Romeel Davé of the University of the Western Cape, Mark > >> Fardal of University of Massachusetts Amherst, Piero Madau of the > >> University of California, Santa Cruz, Amanda Ford of the University of > >> Arizona, Molly Peeples of the Space Telescope Science Institute, and > Joseph > >> McEwen of Ohio State University. > >> > >> The study was funded in part by NASA, the National Science Foundation > and > >> the Ahmanson Foundation. > >> > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
