Andrea Rossi July 12th, 2014 at 9:30 PM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=853&cpage=3#comment-976992> Todd Burkett: We have made substantial investments to replicate ALL the experiments reported in patents and publications. I repeat : ALL. I am sure that, at least in some cases, we know those Technologies better than the inventors themselves. We are taking LENR of our potential competitors very seriously and I confrm what I answered to Giovanni Guerrini today. Warm Regards, A.R.
Rossi and his crew must study the stuff in Jed's library heavily. On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Andrea Rossi > July 12th, 2014 at 5:04 PM > <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=853&cpage=3#comment-976936> > > Giovanni Guerrini: > > I agree with you, but I am very worried of the wannabe competitors that > now are presenting clowneries, like did Defkalion: they are very dangerous, > because their failures will spray dirt on our work, as well as defkalion > did: our enemies are eager to find another defkocones to say that all LENR > world is a clownerie. Therefore I want to say sound and clear: we have > replicated all the existing patents and know hows regarding the LENR > existing in the world and no one of them has manifested a real heat excess > with the following exceptions: Ikegami-Petterson system and Brian Ahern > System. These are the only two systems that actually gave us evidence of a > heat excess. All the other systems that we have reproduced ( and we have > reproduced, with huge investments, all of the systems that have been > proposed in all the world in the last 20 years, with particular attention > on the experiments made in the last 4 years, that have been analyzed with > extreme endeavour) have not given any heat excess evidence. One of them had > put in the market a “kit” that has turned out to be a joke. I have to say > this to make well clear that any future failure coming from all the > burlesque reactors persented recently have nothing to do with our work and > has not any right to cite our work as a reference without our explicit > permission. > > I hope this has been understood sound and clear, because I have been > strongly disturbed form all the insults I had to sustain after the > clownerie of the def… has been put in evidence, even if I had said from the > beginning that def… was a clownerie. Much before Others have put it in > evidence. > > Warm Regards, > A.R. >
