Dear Foks0904 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whispering-gallery_wave
The Whispering gallery wave is the quantum mechanical mechanism that builds Surface Plasmon Polaritons by absorbing all manner of electrons and photons of light from infrared to gamma and blends them together through FANO resonance to form a soliton of EMF. This soliton is a complex particle like the hadron with a single wave form that can readily form a Bose Einstein condensate with other solitons. Topological defects catalyzed by nano antennas (AKA NAE) formed on the surface of micro-particles will produce the whispering gallery wave due to extreme curvature. The wavelength of the soliton is a few nanometers which is the wavelength of extreme ultraviolet (XUV) light By the way, based on recent cosmological observations involving solitons, BEC, and XUV over abundance, I have recently postulated the this soliton forms a BEC in the dust of intergalactic space that can be hundreds of thousands of light years across comprised of entangled photons and electron and is what is referred to as dark matter. We can never recapitulate enough. Someday someone might even read the post. On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: > Well I suppose it couldn't hurt to start a conversation on Ed's theory in > general, as I'm sure some of us know a bit about it. He posits the hydroton > polymer-like cluster that "slowly" dissipates energy through > resonance-induced photon emission. The hydrogen "chain" forms in the > Nuclear Active Environment (NAE). Ed's NAE is a linear nano-crack or > "defect". A similar NAE has been put forward by Meulenberg in his Extended > Lochon theory. Axil, I know you favor nano-cavities as some sort for NAE, > that then link together through some sort of quantum coherent resonance or > "whispering" (?) effect, right? Ed wrote up a rather lengthy article on his > model for a recent issue of JCMNS as well. > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Some appetizers to hold you over >> >> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2896450/posts >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'm still waiting to receive my copy. I'll have more to say then. I'm >>> guessing most haven't gotten around to it either. But generally speaking it >>> deserves some in-depth analysis for sure. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction: / /An Examination of the >>>> Relationship between Observation and Explanation/ by Edmund Storms >>>> >>>> See http://lenrexplained.com/ >>>> ***So.... why is this book being greeted by indifference & yawning by >>>> Vorticians? >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
