You make an excellent point that we have not considered. When hydrogen is
initially desorbed form the hydride, it will change into exotic forms such
as Rydberg crystals. Once formed, these new hydrogen molecular
configurations will no by absorbed back into the hydride.

Desorption of hydrogen from a hydride may be a one way street. This means
that any type of hydrogen manipulation via temperature control will not
affect the reaction strength.

I believe that Rossi has not solved his control problems. He needs another
control parameter other than temperature to control the hot cat.

The results from the six mouth test that we are all waiting for will tell
the tale on this point. The Hot-Cat may produce excess heat but might tend
to meltdown on occasion.


On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Roarty, Francis X <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I think the hydride loads MORE hydrogen from the supply when it is heated
> by allowing the gas population to migrate into regions where vacuum
> wavelengths are suppressed. In these regions the gas contracts to the
> exotic forms that are the subject of all these discussions and theories. I
> won't go so far as to say that this type of pressurized loading is, by
> itself, in conflict with COE since it takes heat and pressure to achieve
> the effect but once achieved the gas continues to move between different
> regions changing freely to different exotic/fractional/relativistic values.
> If Naudt's is correct about the gas being relativistic then I posit the
> contraction we observe is due to negative gravity [negative equivalent
> acceleration] .. a concept hard to imagine because we think of dx/dt only
> in terms of a constant unit of time where 0 dt is the absolute minimum, I
> am positing that suppression of vacuum wavelengths allows us to reduce the
> unit of time  below what we presently accept as the zero value for a
> stationary inertial frame. I predict that the time unit can be suppressed
> enough in these Casimir regions to account for the reports of anomalous
> half life decay. I believe the local perspective of a hydrino or fractional
> hydrogen wrt to space time outside the lattice is consistent with the same
> perspective a stationary observer on earth would have for a near C object
> but using negative acceleration/suppression can achieve the effect without
> any spatial dx. I think confusion will continue to reign over this field
> because of our definitions of time and temperature which ignore
> relativistic effects. I think the hydrino locally perceives negative
> equivalent acceleration as  intense gravity in a direction that appears
> normal local to it's inertial frame but which cause the object to shrink
> from our perspective - I suspect the walls of the confinement shrink away
> as the gas atoms suddenly see a totally empty region of space to one side
> of them while, to the other, the previously inaccessible bottom of the
> cavity suddenly appears large enough for them to continue downward between
> walls that should be otherwise too small for them to fit between. I think
> this is a new form of Lorentzian contraction on the nano scale powered by
> vacuum suppression instead of dx and I believe the normal contraction along
> a single axis is still in effect except it is only available to the hydrino
> while our perspective of the hydrino  is equivalent to that of the near C
> Paradox Twin of a universe suddenly accelerated greatly and shrunken behind
> us as we travel a hypotenuse toward C.
> Fran
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 6:18 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:hydrinos can't do it.
>
> In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Sun, 13 Jul 2014 18:25:22 -0400:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >The key parameters in this exercise are the volume of the hydrogen
> >envelope and the maximum pressure of hydrogen in that envelope. If we
> >were to assume that the hydride replenished the envelope as the
> >pressure decreased due to transmutation to keep the pressure constant,
> >then that would be a different story.
> >
> >That assumption would be the same as connecting the envelope to a
> >hydrogen tank with a pressure regulator attached.
>
> ...but that's exactly why the Hydride is present! If the only Hydrogen
> used was what was in the tank, then it could just be filled from a cylinder
> at the start and closed off, and the Hydride would not be needed at all.
>
> Actually, it's slightly more complicated. The Hydrogen supply is most
> likely regulated during the course of the experiment by deliberately
> controlling the temperature of the Hydride. This effectively has the same
> effect as the gas pedal in a car.
>
> Regards,
>
> Robin van Spaandonk
>
> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>
>

Reply via email to