To understand the dots to be connected, also see these posts as follows for background:
Can dark matter be polaritons​? Cosmic accounting reveals missing light crisis On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Why now?: the Nancy Kerrigan problem > > > > See the post: *Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and LENR *for an introfuction. > > > > > > A critical constraint on dark energy is that it not interfere with the > formation of structure in the Universe. This means that dark energy must > have been relatively unimportant in the past (at least back to the time of > last scattering). If dark energy is characterized by some constant w, in > the past W was small hereby not interfering with structure formation > throughout the universe. Now W has grown large affect the universe greatly. > > > > This means that the dark-energy density evolves more slowly compared to > matter. > > > > That is, in the past dark energy was unimportant and in the future it will > be dominant! > > > > We just happen to live at the time when dark matter and dark energy have > comparable densities. In the words of Olympic skater Nancy Kerrigan, Why > me? Why now?" > > > > This fits the dust born LENR process to a T. In the early universe there > was little space for dust clouds to spread. As the universe gradually > expanded, more space was available for dust clouds to form where LENR could > take hold. Now LENR is becoming the major energy producer in the universe. > For example, XUV light is being produced 400% more than can be explained in > excited hydrogen in these dust clouds than can be explained by existing > radiation sources. > > > > Perhaps this fact is an important clue to unraveling the nature of the > dark energy. > > > > Perhaps LENR it could be the basis of an explanation for the changing size > of the cosmological constant. > > >
