There is a connection between the nature of a particle and the mass that he
Higgs field gives it.

First some Higgs field  background, all the particles that make up matter
have mass — from the lightest, the electron, to the heaviest, the top quark
— and can be left- or right-handed, that is the direction in which they
spin. This handedness of particles is the means of getting mass from the
Higgs field.

Although the Standard Model cannot predict their masses, it does provide a
mechanism whereby elementary particles acquire mass. This mechanism
requires us to accept that the universe is filled with particles that we
have not seen yet or at least only at CERN.

No matter how empty the vacuum looks, it is packed with particles called
Higgs bosons that have zero spin (and are therefore neither left- or
right-handed). Quantum field theory and Lorentz invariance show that when a
particle is injected into the "vacuum", its handedness changes when it
interacts with a Higgs boson. In that meeting with the Higgs boson, the
particle starts to spin in the direction that is opposite to the way it was
spinning originally.

For example, a left-handed electron will become right-handed after the
first collision, then left-handed following a second collision, and so on.
Put simply, the electron cannot travel through the vacuum at the speed of
light because the Higgs field would force it to become massive.

Similarly, muons collide with Higgs bosons more frequently than electrons,
making them 200 times heavier than the electron, while the top quark
interacts with the Higgs boson almost all the time and this type of quark
is just about all mass and very heavy.

This picture also explains why neutrinos are originally thought to be
massless. If a left-handed neutrino tried to collide with the Higgs boson,
it would have to become right-handed. Since way back when it was thought
that such a state exists, the left-handed neutrino was thought to be unable
to interact with the Higgs boson and therefore did not acquire any mass. In
this way, massless neutrinos go hand in hand with the absence of
right-handed neutrinos in the Standard Model.

More recently, it was found experimentally that the left handed neutrino
could turn into a right handed neutrino.

This neutrino spin flip observation now predicts that the neutrino must
have mass.

It is not the actual flipping of the particles spin that produced mass; it
is just the fact that a particle could have the ability to flip its spin
that gives it mass.

The mass rule comes down to this: any particle that has an anti-particle or
in other words, can flip its spin also has mass given to it by the Higgs
boson. This includes particles that can be its own anti-particle call a
Majorana fermion, also referred to as a Majorana particle. This is a
fermion that is its own antiparticle.

It is my contention that elementary particles like photons and electrons
can form more complex compound particles called quasiparticles that can
acquire mass from the Higgs field through their ability to flip their spin
or be their own anti-particle. For example, protons and neutrons are
compound particles of different quarks and they both get mass from the
Higgs field.

Photons and electrons can form a soliton of surface plasmon polaritons.
This soliton like any soliton can be considered a particle
indistinguishable from real elementary particles.

If this SPP soliton is its own anti particle then it can acquire mass from
the Higgs boson. This mechanism of SPP formation may be how light can
acquire mass.

If LENR is occurring all over the cosmos and producing SPP solitons, when
photons join with electrons as a Majorana soliton particle, dark matter
could be dynamically formed adding a new source of mass to the universe.

Reply via email to