Hello Axel, I do understand that there are good theories and not so good dittos. Why so adamant? It seems to me that there is a myriad of theories, some of them have similarities, some of them exclude each other. Very little is won by finding holes in the other theories. Problems are many and the lack of experimental data is the main issue. Therefore it is hard to have any theory confirmed. The well established experiments (BLP, Rossi, etc). are protecting there investment and let very little out about their findings. I realize that it is expensive and difficult to make experiments. However, I think that just now we need to to stop producing more theoretical formats and concentrate on verifying one theory one step at the time. I think Ed Storms have done that and that is what brings credibility to his theory. It does not make it right but very few hypothesis are better substantiated with actual test data. My suggestion is just that. Suggest or do experiments to be done to support your own theories instead of finding holes in others ideas. I think Brad is on the right track. I am happy to provide the microwave:)
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com [email protected] +1 916 436 1899 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Ed Storms just gives us one out of a potential million LENR reaction > results that have been seen in LENR experimentation. Ed never wanted to > consider transmutation as a valid consequence of the LENR reaction. By > embracing transmutation, Ed would need to explain countless variations and > permutations of the way protons and neutrons could come together as a > result of a LENR reaction. > > The Mizuno results showing an endothermic reaction is not possible in Ed > Storms theory. > > The most flexible explanation of the LENR reaction is one that entails a > powerful bolt of energy impacting on an unspecified but variable pile of > atoms that result in any sort of recombination of any number of protons and > neutrons coming back together. > > This powerful bolt of energy would supply the power to permit endothermic > nuclear processes to proceed. > > LENR is more like an atom smasher then a tokomak. > > This contemplation of an endothermic mechanism is a catastrophic sacrilege > of epic proportions for Ed because it violates his beloved and inviolable > laws of thermodynamics. > > But the Mizuno results still must be explained by a global theory of LENR. > > >
