Another area that Ahern needs to look into is the way the Higgs field seems to connect together magnetism and quantum chromodynamics (QCD), which is the theory of quark-gluon interactions.
When Ahern is postulating that nanomagnitism is effecting the vacuum, he may mean to address how the Higgs field and nanomagnitism interact, On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Most scientists are constrained in their focus by their specialization to > a limited field of study. To understand a system fully, many fields of > study must be considered to put all the pieces together. > > > > One obvious area of inquiry that Ahern never pursued is to understand how > magnetism affects the vacuum and/or nuclear stability. > > > > Another important piece of the puzzle that Ahern neglects in the critical > role of quantum mechanics plays as a powerful amplification mechanism > toward powering up Nanomagnetism to huge levels. When the dimensions of the > lattice get below 100 nm, quantum effects predominate. To understand > Nanomagnetism, quantum mechanics is the sole factor that reveals all the > facts in the story of the nano system > > > > Furthermore, Ahern never mentions the pivotal role the spin plays in > Nanomagnetism, including what defeats Nanomagnetism and what supports it. > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yeah he's pretty dismissive of the Heat/Helium work, which I disagree >> with for PdD at least, and we're still waiting on reliable ash measurements >> from NiH, but he's of course entitled to his opinion and I still have a lot >> of respect for his views. I think, like he said, his theory applies better >> to mysterious electromagnetic "free energy" systems than it does to LENR, >> but he thinks the same phenomenon is at play in both. >> >> I think non-linear anharmonic modes may indeed be at play here. As I >> think I mentioned in the interview, on a personal level, I like the analogy >> of loaded hydride in a wet or gaseous system as a non-equilibrium, >> non-linear, open system of sorts -- so I think energy concentration (in >> "violation" of the second law) may indeed be at play. But on the flip side >> I can't totally dismiss Storms' point of view that doesn't think any sort >> of abnormal energy concentration is necessary -- that linear >> reaction-diffusion can get H/D to the NAE efficiently enough without >> needing to invoke non-linear dynamics. It's hard to say. >> >> I'm hoping the ash analysis being carried out by ELFORSK can shed some >> light on what's going on (i.e. fusion or not fusion). I'm banking on that, >> because I don't really have a lot of faith DGT will be releasing a wealth >> of mass spectrometer work anytime soon, even though they promised to at >> last years ICCF. >> >> Regards, >> John >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> This is an excellent interview. Have not finished yet, but there are a >>> few things to add. Ahern is strongly impressed with a magnetic invention >>> (Manelas device) since he did the 8 day test - and which device others have >>> belittled. It is similar to the Floyd Sweet device (for the historians of >>> overunity). The cross-connection to LENR is not easy to explain but is >>> there. >>> >>> >>> >>> It can be noted up front that Ahern does not believe that there is any >>> evidence whatsoever for nuclear fusion in LENR. That includes deuterium >>> fusion to helium and especially Ni-H. He thinks it is all nanomagnetic. >>> Nanomagnetism is roughly equivalent to a combination of superferromagnetism >>> and superparamagnetism. They are two are extremes of the same phenomenon. >>> >>> >>> >>> He believes that the helium seen in Pd-D is basically measurement error >>> - noise. Krivit is probably pleased with that assessment. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Alan Fletcher >>> >>> Foks0904 wrote: >>> >>> I'm sure many of you know of Brian Ahern from his EPRI report, his MIT >>> colloquium appearance earlier this year, and now his collaboration with >>> MFMP. Even if you're not aware of him, I think this conversation has enough >>> for 3-4 threads worth of topics. We even flirt with the ever-so-dangerous & >>> taboo possibility of "perpetual motion". Titled: "Nanomagnetism, >>> Cooperative Modes, & Non-Linear LENR". Hope you guys/gals enjoy: >>> >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_kID_E-3tY >>> >>> An outline can be found here: >>> http://jmag0904.wordpress.com/2014/07/25/dr-brian-ahern-nanomagnetism-cooperative-modes-non-linear-lenr/ >>> >>> >>> That's a MUST-LISTEN link. (And I'm only half-way through!) >>> >>> Goes into some of the history of anharmonic modes (related to discrete >>> breathers, Quodons we've discussed recently). >>> >>> At about 19minutes he says superconductivity and >>> (super?)-ferro-magnetism are closely related (and that the latter persists >>> up to a thousand degrees.). >>> >>> Then I *think* he says that LENR could be a localized ferromagnetic >>> effect tapping into vacuum energy. >>> >>> Needs a transcript. >>> >>> >> >
