Sure it might be harder to directly replicate his results, but the same force from an asymmetrical spark discharge was noted. ***Would that be the Asymmetrical Thrust Capacitor proposal that I submitted?
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:09 PM, John Berry <[email protected]> wrote: > I was not aware of Poher, but given that shouldn't Morton be considered a > further and earlier verification of this effect? > > Sure it might be harder to directly replicate his results, but the same > force from an asymmetrical spark discharge was noted. > > It might also be worth noting Piggot: > http://www.rexresearch.com/piggott/piggott.htm > > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There is an intriguing cross-connection between two other controversial >> lines of anti-gravity experiment: Eugene Podkletnov (mentioned in the >> Wired >> article) and Claude Poher (not mentioned). Here is a review of Poher’s >> superconductor. >> http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1101/1101.2419.pdf >> >> NASA has reportedly confirmed an effect of reactionless acceleration with >> Poher’s device, but nothing turns up to verify that, on a quick google >> search. >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Poher >> >> Here is a technology that can unite all three phenomena… >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_radio_frequency >> >> >> From: Alain Sepeda >> >> this is the 3rd test, done with different metrology, and >> with many cross checking documented on EmDrive (like changing turn...)…he >> have good hint, no more... about the theory the idea that the EmDrive is >> surfing, rowing, sculling on the virtual particles of the void is the most >> reasonable I've heard. >> >> David Roberson: >> >> I have a hangup about the conservation of momentum that >> makes me skeptical of this device. My guess is that the thrust will be >> shown to be an error once everything is taken into account. The power to >> generate the large amount of RF must enter the device from somewhere and >> that is likely the root of the thrust. >> >> Eric Walker wrote: >> >> >> >> http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-07/31/nasa-validates-impossible-spa >> ce-drive >> <http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-07/31/nasa-validates-impossible-space-drive> >> >> >> >> >
