the experiment was dow at lower power compared to Shawyer EmDrive....
20W for cannae Drive at NASA, 300-1200W with EmDrive in China.

the performance of EmDrive is about 200-1000mN/kW and Cannae drive (and the
null variant) 1.5-5mN/kW...

my best bet is that Cannae Drive is an Emdrive born from 0.5% anomalies on
cannae drive shape. just a bet.

now the question is what will Shawyer and yang Juan will show at IAC14


2014-08-05 17:43 GMT+02:00 Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>:

> Interesting side note from
> http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052
>
> Which is the anomalous RF thrust device, aka Emdrive. NASA was not
> attracted
> (so to speak) to the EmDrive for many years, since it violates the law of
> the conservation of momentum and a few other problems. NASA has some pretty
> good ideas why it shouldn't work, but when China is about to upstage you,
> NASA can change course with the best of them. Same will be true with LENR.
>
> As discussed here and elsewhere, approximately 50 micro-Newtons of thrust
> was recorded from the microwave oven, oops make that the electric
> propulsion
> test device - consisting of a radio RF resonant cavity excited at
> approximately 935 megahertz. Not sure why they chose that frequency, but
> anyway...
>
> This is about at tenth of a mosquito power, in thrust, or 0.1 mq ...  :-)
>
> ...but nevertheless, the result is drawing huge attention, since in space
> reactionless thrust is cumulative thrust and in the vacuum of space, with
> LENR power of course, this kind of cumulative thrust could take sputnik to
> a
> large fraction of light speed.... in a few billion years maybe.
>
> The side note to this story is that some of the apparatus was built in
> Doylestown PA.
>
> Ron Kita, who occasionally post here- has a company named Chiralex, which
> is
> located in Doylestown, and which is
> engaged in "gravitational shielding research" which is not the same but
> close.
>
> Is that merely a coincidence? Hope Ron is tuned-in and will give us the
> inside scoop... if he can, but he is probably under NDA
>
>
>

Reply via email to