Well I have spent a lively afternoon communicating with Randell Mills via his youtube channel in between seeing patients. My thought was that if he had made a specific prediction of a 3.5 KeV emission signature PRIOR to the release of that figure by Bulbul et al, that would be a remarkable hitting-it-out-of-the ballpark moment for his theory . He responded with the following:
(Mills:) The formula for the X-ray feature with a 3.48 keV cutoff appears years ahead of this discovery in Chp 5 of my GUTCP. The observed line is for the transition involving the abundant reactants of H and H(1/4) http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/Chapter-5_3.5_keV_feature.pdf http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory-2/book/book-download/ The first appears to be a realtime updated version of his text that mentions both the 3.48 keV cutoff and the Chandra data. Having the Chandra results already in hand makes mentioning the 3.48 cutoff figure less compelling. The second document appears to be his text as it stood in Spring 2014, before the Chandra results were released. If you scroll to page 221 you will see the same language as in the first document, but there is no 3.48 prediction, unless that is embedded in the numbers that are presented. So has he hit it out of the park or not? I am not skilled enough to be able to tell. On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > *From:* Steve High > > > > Someone is bound to post this, but I'm dying to know so I'll pose the > question: what is the cosmological spectral line predicted by Mills' > theory? Anything close to 3.56 KeV? > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg95266.html > > >
