I do not know whether they are fraudulent because I'm not a police detective and I do not have the power of subpoena. They seem suspicious. I would not do business with them. ***Isn't that a bit sideways, considering that you DID do business with them and they went out of their way not to pay you?
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> wrote: > > Why is it that a company like BLP, with a published theory . . . a >> permanent headquarters and a published schedule and timeline - gets kicked >> around like frauds >> > > Anyone can have a theory. A theory plus $23.25 will get you 36 Hershey > Bars at Amazon.com. BLP does have a timeline. They have set many deadlines > since 1992. But they have missed every deadline as far as I know. They keep > changing their methodology. They have cried wolf many times. They have > spent tens of millions of dollars with nothing to show for it. So their > track record is not good. However, I do not know anyone who accuses them of > fraud. > > BLP should follow through on one methodology that produces continuous > heat. They should do a demonstration that easily convinces people. Perhaps > they could have done this with their original 1992 technique. Perhaps it > could not be made into a practical source of energy for some reason, but > they should have made a good demonstration out of it. The present > demonstration is not convincing to me because the reaction is so brief and > because bomb calorimetry is tricky. > > > >> And yet .... >> >> A company like DGT, with no published theory, zero validations, no >> endorsements - in fact 2 endorsements against it, no professors working on >> it, 1 fraudulent demonstration with intentional fraudulent measurements, no >> prototypes (wait ... 1 mythical hyperion prototype), no permanent office >> address and no schedule and timeline whatsoever - gets praised and its >> imaginary technology gets mentioned in this forum as it it was real. >> > > I and many others have pointed out these problems with DGT many times. So, > most people here are not giving them a free pass. I still stop short of > saying the demonstration was definitely fraudulent or intentionally > fraudulent, but on the other hand I uploaded the paper by Gamberale saying > that. > > I do not know whether they are fraudulent because I'm not a police > detective and I do not have the power of subpoena. They seem suspicious. I > would not do business with them. > > - Jed > >
