That's a pretty good theory, Jones. It upholds many aspects of Occham's Razor. No ZPE, not too much of Mills where he goes off into the weeds, coincidental dark matter 3.7keV gain.
Now, if we align up these electrons in such a way that they interact with others like themselves in a 1D chain, their mutual vibrational energy might generate a Fermionic Condensate (similar to a BEC but with Fermions) and perhaps we have a reason why the generation of Negative Coulomb Drag helps break down the Coulomb Barrier. www.nature.com/nnano/journal/v6/n12/full/nnano.2011.182.html Positive and negative Coulomb drag in vertically integrated ... - Nature www.nature.com/nnano/journal/v6/n12/full/nnano.2011.182.htmlSimilarOct 30, 2011 ... A quantum wire induces both positive and negative electron drag in another wire 15 nm away, changing the voltage across the second wire by ... Negative Coulomb drag in a one-dimensional wire. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16840694 Science. 2006 Jul 14;313(5784):204-7. Negative Coulomb drag in a one- dimensional wire. Yamamoto M, Stopa M, Tokura Y, Hirayama Y, Tarucha S. Positive and negative Coulomb drag in vertically integrated one ... arxiv.org/abs/1008.5155CachedAug 30, 2010 ... Positive and negative Coulomb drag in vertically integrated one-dimensional quantum wires. D. Laroche, G. Gervais, MP Lilly, JL Reno. Positive and negative Coulomb drag in vertically ... - ResearchGate www.researchgate.net/.../51756163_Positive_and_negative_Coulomb_drag_in_vertically_integrated_one-dimensional_quantum_wires Re-entrant Negative Coulomb Drag in a 1D Quantum Circuit D. Laroche1,2, G. Gervais1, M. P. Lilly2, and J. L. Reno2 1Department of Physics, McGill University, ... On 8/14/14, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Bob Higgins > > > > However, my understanding (and my differential equations study is many years > old) is that with the addition of special relativity effects, the system is > no longer linear. Thus, the eigenstates can no longer be used as a complete > orthogonal basis for the general solution. It doesn't necessarily mean that > the eigenvalues are wrong, only that they cannot be used in linear > combination to form the general solution. > > > > Bob, although you may not have intended it this way, your post made me think > of an even better-fitting scenario for describing the details of hydrogen > oscillation, and for supplying thermal gain, instead of Mills permanent > fractional state. > > > > Imagine that there is no lasting state of redundant orbitals as Mills > claims, but also imagine that the electron of the confined hydrogen atom > oscillates through redundant ground states and can, on occasion, be reduced > to the lowest 1/137 orbital - and then reinflate almost immediately. This > would be symmetric for energy balance - on every other reduced orbital but > the last, and in most oscillations, there would be no gain. > > > > However, this deep orbital is only a few Fermi in distance from the nucleus. > The electron is relativistic and heavy when it gets there. Coincidentally, > the strong force it is 137 times stronger than electromagnetism, and if the > strong force were to exert a bit of extra pull on the electron in the last > orbital, then the electron becomes even heavier. The electron will then be > able to give up more energy on reinflation than it borrowed on redundancy. > > > > Thus the extra energy comes from the strong force, and from proton mass. The > gain is 3.7 keV at this final orbital which matches the “dark matter” > signature but in a way that has been missed by Mills. > > > > This viewpoint keeps the gain as “nuclear” and avoids invoking ZPE, which is > a turn-off for many observers. It also avoids Mills theory and most other > LENR theories. > > > > Therefore, it pleases very few of those who have a pet theory to promote > ... > > > > Jones > > > >
