Jones,
Forgive the naive question, but I am really not informed in this; but what
is the reason why this fractional state is NOT a "hydrino". Seems like it
is a fractional state like a hydrino. Is it just refusal to give credence
to the terms used by Mills; or is there a mathematical and theoritical
reason? Is it because these fractional states do not correspond to Mills
hydrino fractional states? Does the 3.7kev fractional state correpond to a
hydrino fractional state at all? or does not? What fractional level of
Hydrino does GUTCP predict that might closely correspond to 3.7kev?
And since you tied this fractional state to LENR anomalous energy, are you
able to make calculations if the energy released can be explained by this
fractional state mechanism? (I started a thread on this question but nobody
answered and I am incapable of making such computations.) Is there enough
energy to explain the heat in the HotCat? It seems to me that this question
needs to be the primary questions that needs to be answered. If it can,
then this speculation gains credibility. If it can't, then we need to look
for something else.
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jones Beene" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 12:09 AM
Subject: [Vo]:LENR <-> dark mater <-> DDL connection
Eric,
In posts yesterday you have raised a number of good observations - and
there
is a bit more information floating around cyberspace this week about the
putative single Dirac (KG) ground state, which can refine the idea of a
stable fractional state for LENR, which is also the identical state of
dark
matter. Thus - a new subject heading, as this is not Mills territory
anymore.
The prior "strong force" suggestion (acting on hydrogen oscillation) for
explaining gain in LENR was a hasty error... my bad. The beauty of not
being
tied to any one explanation is that "instant redirection" is possible :-)
The flavor of the day hypothesis is that hydrogen may possess two ground
states: one at half an Angstrom orbital radius and one about 40 times
less.
Most of the hydrogen in the Universe is in the deeper, denser, colder and
more stable state. Ostensibly, it is 64,000 times more compact than
hydrogen
but is spread out in a "thinner-than-gas" form which does not aggregate.
The
lack of gravitational self-interaction is the mystery. Does the lower
ground
state itself "flip" hydrogen into the category of "mirror matter"? i.e.
lack
of P-symmetry or mirror reflection symmetry?
Other experts provide mathematical evidence that there is no such state,
so
there are arguments either way - but the bottom line could be coming from
cosmology - and the dozens of new papers on emission peaks from clouds of
supposed dark matter, the identity of which can now be hypothesized to
simply be a cold isomer of hydrogen which loses most of its mutual
attraction. The actual radiation which is detected comes from new hydrogen
going into the cloud, since there is a remnant weak attraction in mirror
matter. There is the possibility that the dark matter cloud is itself
related, or can be identified as the inverse of the black hole, meaning it
is connected via a wormhole to a black hole somewhere else in space. But
let's stick to LENR implications.
The Klein Gordon equation for the single deep level gives the ground state
value 3.7kev, which is interesting wrt dark matter (and the mounting
evidence of x-rays at ~3.5 keV which value has been red-shifted, due to
distance). The eigenfunction has a distance which is reduced from 50 pm
(Bohr radius) down to 120 fm. This is near the value obtained by the Dirac
equation. Emission in this range also have a value which could have been
undetected in 24 years of LENR, since instrumentation for x-ray detection
in
this spectrum is commercially absent, outside of NASA.
One further implication of this cross identity of LENR and dark matter in
the cosmological context is that we have a very stable deep ground state,
one which will not decay, as is the usual explanation for the signature.
What we see coming from these clouds of dark matter is new hydrogen
emitting
the radiation signature. As for nanomagnetism, the magnetic field of the
new
f/H species, being inverse square goes from 12.5 Tesla to 156 T yet there
is
no magnetic attraction either, possibly diamagnetism - meaning that this
is
a new form of matter, not just dark but dark and mirrored.
This points to a way towards the accumulating proof of an LENR <-> dark
mater <-> DDL connection which is most likely already in evidence in the
Letts/Cravens effect.
I will save that for another post.
From: Eric Walker
Why wouldn't the extra energy be lost again when the
electron eventually returns
to a higher orbital? (Since it would have to escape the
strong force again.)
Electrons don't feel the strong force. (Although are
affected by Coulomb attraction.)
Eric
