So you're pissed that Axil was an advocate of some theory that you tried to replicate and failed to do so. How is that Axil's fault? Lots of experiments have had replication failures, is it the fault of the person who suggests it's worth replicating?
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> wrote: > What kind of proof do you require? > > I have since dismantled my lab since I am now busy with my wave project; > but I still have the Flat Plat Heat Exchanger contraption that I built to > try to replicate the experiment. Do you want me to send it to you? > > If I can prove this, will you shut up? and give my challenge to Axil some > support? You've challenged me and I will prove it, will you do the same? > > > Jojo > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> > *To:* John Milstone <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 11:35 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:JANAP 128..Kudos...the Axil Enigma > > Prove that your resources were spent instead of just annoying everyone by > complaining about his anonymity. Your test is "anonymous". > > > 2014-08-17 0:31 GMT-03:00 Jojo Iznart <[email protected]>: > >> Axil could be proposing useless "rabbit hole" ideas which would cause >> people to go down the wrong trail and waste time and resources and effort. >> > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > [email protected] > >
