McEk August 19th, 2014 at 4:01 AM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=853&cpage=11#comment-989012>
Dear Adrea, I am following your E-cat/ Hot cat developments now for 3 years and I have read about all the little and big steps in progress you are making. I would love to be one of your team, but I am sure that will not be possible. Nevertheless, I constantly think of things I read. I have tried to ask your opinion on this earlier, but it is difficult to find the right entrance of your blog. My suggestion is to run the Hot cat at such high temperature that runaway would start and then use the cooling medium to control the temperature. The advantage is that there is no need for stimulating the LENR process and energy input, so the COP would virtually be infinite. It would bring the possibility of producing electricity in combination with the Hot cat a huge step forward. The disadvantage is that you cannot control the energy output of the Hot cat, but just its stability. However, windmills and solar panels suffer a similar problem and that does not seem a real disadvantage. I would love to read your opinion about this, although I expect you have had a similar idea yourself or within your team.? ============================ I would like to see an experiment done to put the Ni/H reactor into a meltdown mode to see how high the temperature will climb. The reactor hydrogen enclosure might be made of some high temperature refectory material like tungsten or carbon and possibly be cooled by lithium as a safety coolant backup. If it does have a ceiling, the Ni/H reactor might be protected from failure using refectory material, but it will not startup again once it have been cooled down.
