In reply to James Bowery's message of Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:00:58 -0500: Hi James,
I wouldn't hunt too hard if I were you. I haven't said much more on this particular issue in the past than I said recently. I would be happy to answer any particular questions you might have. [snip] >This is of no small interest to me as I'm currently holding off on using up >one of my more influential contacts on Mills/BLP pending the resolution, in >my mind, of the He4/heat correlation issue relative to Mills. The only >person I know of who has put forth an explanation for how hydrino formation >could result in an He4/heat correlation in which the heat matches that >expected from fusion to He4 ash ><https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg97315.html> is Robin >van Spaandonk. I have not yet had time to hunt down his explanation and >examine it. The mainstream would ignore both the correlation and Mills but >if one is more intellectually honest than the mainstream, one has work to >do before coming to a conclusion about any of this. > >On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> To correct some voice input errors: >> >> >> Helium alone cannot leak IN without argon. >> >> I mean the atmospheric He to Ar ratio is fixed. >> >> >> I gave him links to my paper and to my sources -- WHICH say the same thing >> . . . >> >> I did not make this stiff up, as Dave Barry used to say. >> >> - Jed >> >> Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
