Fran, You should use paragraph breaks. They would make your contributions easier to read.
Eric On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Roarty, Francis X < [email protected]> wrote: > [image: http://www.byzipp.com/gamma.png] > > > > > > Sorry in advance, this is a work in progress initiated by a desire to > offer a more succinct argument regarding the relativistic theory of > Casimir effect. The gist of the concept is that mainstream has convinced > the world of how difficult it is to reach relativistic effects based on the > formula above where v^2 must be a significant portion of C^2. I have > followed Puthoff’s, Haisch and Rhueda’s papers regarding virtual particles > acting like raindrops thru our 3d plane where a speeding car is used as an > analogy to near C spacecraft where instead of accumulating vacuum pressure > the car accumulates raindrops as it accelerates thru the storm. I totally > agree that this is an energy intensive method to access relativistic > effects but disagree that physics can therefore discount this possibility > in lattice defects or geometries that initiate large Casimir, Hall or > London type forces. In fact I am positing that the above formula with a > quality coefficient proportional to ideal metals could be related directly > to the Casimir formula in the same way 2piFL was related to 1/2piFC to > derive resonant formula for electronics or solve for any of the other > variables you choose to algebraically isolate. I think that the breach in > isotropy of Casimir effect demonstrates a negative energy where instead of > increasing the intersection rate of windshield to the ambient “raindrops” > we instead make the Casimir cavity into an umbrella where the ambient is > reduced - no energy is required utilizing instead a quantum property of the > conductive metals and geometry. The breaches in isotropy even relative to > each other occur at the inverse cube of distance between geometries forming > a tapestry of wild fluctuations [as seen by the random motion of gas > particles between them] in the geometrical sweet spot where these quantum > forces can focus between 2-12nm. The closer together the regions, the > higher the force and the more rapidly the changes in focal points such that > even the smallest deviations from parallel boundaries produce large > variations in vacuum pressure for the randomly moving gas atoms between. > These forces are felt between nano powders or skeletal catalysts that form > mirrors/boundaries/plates and effect any gas atoms migrating between them. > The hydrogen atoms migrating thru these regions feel equivalent negative > acceleration in the same way we feel gravity but pushing them away from our > 3d plane instead of attracting us to it they seem to contract symmetrically > from our perspective instead of only in the direction of near C velocity we > are familiar with for the Paradox spacecraft. I made the previous > statement to underline that the hydrogen gas migrating thru this region is > in a negatively modified region where it perceives the outside world > equivalently accelerating away from it. I am convinced that condensed form > of hydrogen are actually relativistically contracted in the same manner as > an observer standing at the bottom a deep gravity well experiencing > equivalent acceleration at some fraction of C without spatial motion still > seem shrunken and time dilated to us outside his gravity well even without > spatial motion. We are used to the stationary perspective but the paradox > spacecraft would see the universe around it to seemingly expand > symmetrically time units becoming larger while spatial units get smaller. > The Casimir effect [umbrella] is just the opposite where space units get > larger - possibly allowing relativistic displacement to keep the Casimir > Lipschitz limit beyond the 2-12nm limit from our perspective while still > maintaining it from the perspective of the dimensionally displaced hydrogen > trapped between. Oh and yes I believe time units get smaller accounting for > anomalous decay rates of radioactive gases but by a method of segregation > where equal and opposite regions form tributaries that concentrate the > umbrella effect in the cavity while the surrounding outer regions are > slightly increased like the rain running off an umbrella would as a > necessary component since we cant get something for nothing and it is only > the random motion of gas and their natural affinity to seek openings of a > certain scale that we are exploiting – perhaps the claims of reduced decay > rates and cold anomalies are related to gases that have an affinity for > staying outside the umbrella under the “runoff” regions. > > Fran > >
