Of interest: 

 

BRIEF HISTORY OF COLD FUSION AT BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY Secondary title:  

PIEZONUCLEAR FUSION AT BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY



By BYU Professors Jae Ballif, William Evenson, and Steven Jones
Compiled in 1989 


I. Scientific Team
II. History

Quote


I. Scientific Team
A. Brigham Young University Faculty Members - Department of Physics and 
Astronomy Steven E. Jones (PI) E. Paul Palmer J. Bart Czirr, Daniel L. Decker 
Gary L. Jensen
B. Brigham Young University Faculty Members - Department of Chemistry James M. 
Thorne
C. Brigham Young University students Stuart F. Taylor Rod Price J. W. Wang 
David Mince Eugene Sheeley Paul Dahl  Paul Banks S. Seth Jones David E. Jones
D. University of Arizona Faculty Members - Department of Physics Johann Rafelski

II. History
A. Scientific paper published March 1986 (submitted June 1985)
The roots of our work regarding piezonuclear fusion are described in a 
scientific paper published in the Journal of Physics G: Nuclear physics, 12: 
213-221. This paper was received by the journal on 12 June 1985 (over three 
years before we heard of Pons and Fleischmann, or of Andrei Lipson in Russia, 
or of their related work) and published in March 1986.

A1. Theory proposed which presages Brigham Young University experiments
The detailed mathematical framework given in the paper was worked out primarily 
by Dr. Clinton Van Siclen, author on the paper with Dr. Steven E. Jones. The 
paper discusses fusion at room temperature and how this might be enhanced by 
increasing the density of hydrogen isotopes. The paper discusses the transition 
of hydrogen to the metallic state under high pressures and other technical 
points. One significant concept explored in this paper is that a hypothetical 
particle "with mass twice that of the electron" could lead to room temperature 
fusion at a rate of approximately one fusion per minute per kilogram of 
deuterium. This is close to the actual rates observed in later experiments at 
Brigham Young University by Jones and colleagues, and the theoretical framework 
given in this early publication continues to be a possible explanation for the 
cold/piezonuclear fusion effect. Indeed, this paper is referred to in our later 
papers on the Brigham Young University experiments since it provides a 
theoretical, mathematical foundation for cold fusion.

A2."Piezonuclear fusion" used by Steven Jones of Brigham Young University to 
describe cold fusion In addition to initiating the 1985 study, Steven Jones 
(one of the authors) coined the term "piezonuclear fusion" in analogy to the 
term "thermonuclear fusion," to indicate that the proposed approach is to 
induce fusion by "squeezing" the hydrogen nuclei together at near room 
temperatures rather than by heating them to very high temperatures. (The prefix 
"piezo-" comes from a Greek work meaning to squeeze or compress.) 

 

Dr. Paul Palmer used the term "cold fusion" beginning in early 1986.

B. Brigham Young University Physics Colloquium 12 March 1986
      E. Paul Palmer suggested geophysical applications
The paper was published in March 1986, and on March 12, 1986 many of the 
concepts in the paper were described by Dr. Jones at a Colloquium of the BYU 
Physics Department. BYU Physics Professor Paul Palmer was present and 
associated these ideas with geological data on heat and helium-3 which are 
correlated in volcanoes and other thermal regions of the earth. Both heat and 
helium-3 are released in fusion reactions (proton-deuteron and 
deuteron-deuteron reactions). Dr. Palmer suggested that rock, lava, or crystals 
in the earth might help to catalyze the fusion reaction. This creative leap is 
recorded in Dr. Palmer's logbook, dated March 13, 1986 in some detail (copies 
available on request to BYU Physics Department).

C. Report to DOE 13 May 1986
    Our work on cold piezonuclear fusion was reported to the DOE in the 1985-86 
Annual Performance Report, dated 13 May 1986, along with three related 
documents: the Van Siclen/Jones paper on piezouclear fusion, a note entitled 
"Experiments in Cold Fusion" dated 28 March 1986 by Paul Palmer; and "Comments 
on Catalyzed Fusion," a note by Steven Jones dated 1 April 1986. It was at this 
time that Prof. Jones received permission from the DOE funding agent R 
Gajewiski to pursue research on this aspect of cold nuclear fusion under an 
already existing DOE grant to Brigham Young University for muon-catalyzed 
fusion research.

D. Brigham Young University's experimental program D1. Planning began in March 
1986
     As a result of discussions generated by the Physics Department colloquium 
by Dr. Jones on March 12, 1986, an experimental program was worked out to test 
these new ideas. An important discussion meeting was held at BYU on April 7, 
1986, involving Profs. Czirr, Jones, and Palmer of BYU, and Johann Rafelski of 
the University of Arizona, along with student researchers. Plans for the 
research were extensively developed at the meeting. Prof. Rafelski had been 
very active in theoretical work on piezonuclear fusion since late 1985 and 
strongly urged the active pursuit of this experimental effort at BYU.

D2. Use of Pd, Li, Al, Cu, Ni, Pt under non-equilibrium conditions, was 
outlined 7 April 1986 - notarized lab notebook page. 
Prof. Jones's brief notes from the April 7, 1986, meeting record that the 
metals aluminum, copper, nickel, platinum, palladium (because it "absorbs 
hydrogen readily"), and lithium were discussed as prime candidates for the 
process. The importance of non-equilibrium conditions was discussed; in 
particular, "shocked hydrides" and "electric discharge" were considered. These 
notes were notarized that day by Lee R. Phillips, a notary and BYU attorney, 
showing the importance attached to these ideas by the physicists present.
     
D3. Geophysical evidence for cold fusion was sought in the scientific 
literature as early as April 1986
     On April 13, 1986, Prof. Palmer noted in his logbook a number of fusion 
reactions to be studied, including the deuteron + lithium reaction. (On March 
18, he had noted the high amounts of sodium and lithium in magmas; these later 
became ingredients in our electrolyte solution, commonly known as "Mother Earth 
Soup".) On April 16, he records the findings of a paper by the Russian 
physicists B.A. Mamyrin, L. V. Khabarin, an V. S. Yudenich [Dokl. Adad. Nauk. 
SSSR, 237: 1054 (1987)] in which they report excess helium-3 found in various 
metals. This paper was encouraging to us, but we were surprised that no 
follow-up work was recorded in the literature.
D4. Electrochemical cell built and measurements taken beginning May 1986 On May 
22, 1986, our first electrochemical cell for "electrolytic infusion of hydrogen 
into metals" was
built (see Prof. Palmer's logbook) and on May 23, D2O (heavy water) was added. 
Using a sodium-
iodide detector, we looked first for gamma rays from proton-deuteron fusion, 
and found on May 27 that the foreground rate when the cell operating was 
slightly higher than the background rate when the cell was not operating, but 
the result was not statistically significant. In June, we developed another 
means of loading hydrogen isotopes into metals, using pressurized gases, and 
added a neutron detector.

D5.. Work on a highly sensitive, energy resolving neutron detector was begun in 
1986, since neutrons of the correct energy are a sure indicator of nuclear 
fusion
     Throughout the summer of 1986, work was done on the neutron detector, 
while different electrolytes were tried, including the addition of NaOH or 
H2SO4 to D2O and the addition of "impurity salts" of
various metals. We also tried loading the cathode with deuterium gas before 
beginning the electrolysis (see, e.g., 10 September 1986 entry). By September 
3, 1986, we saw a foreground minus background
rate of about 5x10-3 in the neuron counter, but the result was neither not 
consistently repeatable. However, this rate proved to be consistent with the 
rate obtained in later work when the neutron counter system had been 
dramatically improved. As the Fall 1986 school term began anew, we concluded 
that in order to make progress in our work we had to first improve the neutron 
detector. Bart Czirr and Gary Jensen continued this work. Some of the effort 
went into trying to find suitable hydrogen-rich, inorganic scintillator. While 
this work continued, Dr. Jones pursued muon-catalyzed fusion research.

D6. Student papers presented on piezonuclear fusion experiments in March and 
April 1988
     In January, 1988, Prof. Jones organized a student research class along 
with Prof. Palmer and Prof. Larry Rees. Cold or piezonuclear fusion was one of 
the principal research topics, pursued by students Paul Dahl and Paul Banks. 
Both wrote term papers on the topic. On 12 March 1988, Paul Dahl presented an 
oral paper at the Spring Research Conference of the BYU College of Physical 
Sciences and Mathematics; his paper was entitled "An Experimental Investigation 
of Piezo-nuclear Fusion." On 25 March 1988, we prepared some deuterided metal 
samples, which we sent to Harmon Craig of the University of California at San 
Diego, for helium and tritium analysis. These examples were later sent to Al 
Nier of the University of Minnesota, but analysis had not been completed as of 
30 March 1989 as our paper for Nature neared completion.

D7. Further experiments planned, research program set out and pursued 
vigorously from August 1988

 

Reply via email to