it is open peer review. Pomp start to propose critic. he is desperate. he should join 9/11 truthers. (sorry guys).
as Beaudette stated we should focus on heat, not nuclear ashes. this is the key even if physicist don't understand heat, engineers, thus investors, do understand heat. my bet is that the report will be in WSJ before it will be accepted by high impact journal, NyT,SciAm and alike. 2014-10-09 3:04 GMT+02:00 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>: > Patrick Ellul <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Jed, >> Side-track question... what constitutes a peer-review? >> > > We are peerless in this field. Posterity or God must judge us. > > > >> And does this report have one? >> > > Seriously, not as far as I know. > > Peer-review is overrated. > > - Jed > >
