Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: In short, the IR being picked up by the camera and then being raised to 4th > power by the calculations was a bogus reading, which was essentially the > glow of the resistance wires.
Then why did it agree with the thermocouple, and why did it register similar high temperatures in places that were not incandescent? > … then there is the “control” test – which is the emission of the “dummy > reactor”, which was done at a few hundred input watts, which is nowhere > near > the output level of the purported energy generating regime. The calibration was done at 486 W and and then the cell was run at 790 W for two days. That seems reasonably close to me. The temperature should have been about the same. I cannot imagine any mechanism that would make it go so much higher, other than anomalous excess heat. - Jed
