From: Foks0904
I find it funny that anonymous GoatGuy is literally one of the best-read "skeptics" out there and get's so much play, but in my view he deserves it because he's pretty good and the "skeptical" community generally sucks. Still don't think his objections discredit the report, but I wouldn't mind seeing them answered. You’re right about GoatGuy, which makes me wonder who he is. Do you know? >From other posts, it would appear that he is from Berkeley, likes wine and has >little patience with the bogosity of gullible true-believers … but he does not >have the demeanor of a physics professor. I suspect that if and when good data comes along, he will not be too stubborn to change his views on LENR or Rossi. All of his objections that I have seen are valid, whereas almost none of Mary Yugo’s are … except the ones George has borrowed from GG. Experiment rules - but only if one can trust the data. That is what is so disappointing about this report, which quite frankly is less convincing then the one that preceded it. Instead of remedying those errors, most of them were repeated as if the authors were unaware of the prior criticism, and new ones were added. Too bad, as there was great anticipation for this report - and it would have not been hard to do it right - but that would have required getting rid of Levi as a starting point, and maybe Rossi needed to have an inside man. Jones
