In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 11 Oct 2014 12:17:07 -0300: Hi, [snip] >The guy is open minded. Helps people with alternative ideas. Let's see what >he has to say about the new report: > >http://www.science20.com/a_quantum_diaries_survivor/cold_fusion_a_better_study_on_the_infamous_ecat-146700
While I agree that Rossi's involvement is regrettable, there is still the small matter of where the excess energy came from, and it does appear to be a relatively good match for a nuclear reaction involving the amount of fuel that was present. IOW while Rossi's involvement is a problem, I still tend to believe the results. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
