as usual proposing a test like isotopic analysis befire having gathere all the conspiracy theories from a previous test, is the best way to be mudied by crazy theories...
note how they no more attack the power the only critics that I'(ve sen are : - the isotopic analysis, rossi presence, no theory (would they have hidden that test it would have been ok) - alumina transparency, a new fact (would they have kept the metal casing it would be ok) - the second powermeter... too complex... change method... (they start t be absurd, but that is their tactic to ask what they rejected before, and critic what they asked) the tactic of the moving target, and always ignore the hard evidence to focus on what you can attack. it is political debate tactic, not science. 2014-10-12 18:53 GMT+02:00 Foks0904 . <[email protected]>: > Can't wait to not read Krivit's laser-sharp analysis. > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> http://news.newenergytimes.net/2014/10/12/rossi-handles-samples-in-alleged-independent-test-of-his-device/ >> >> -- >> Daniel Rocha - RJ >> [email protected] >> > >
