From: Randy Wuller
With all due respect, I don’t think the text books would support any nuclear change under the circumstances. What makes NI62 which is found in nature and was in both the before and after sample disturbing? The energy release from 58Ni to Ni62 is massive. Gamma radiation would be evident for one thing - but more troubling is that there is no feasible pathway to get there, which does not leave a long trail of “debris” so to speak or involve multi-body reactions. When a person is known to have the pure isotope, then the most likely scenario for how it appears in the sample is that the individual put it there intentionally. As to the LI6, why is that product any more unlikely than the nuclear process itself which many would say is impossible as to any isotopic or elemental change? The massive isotopic shift is the problem. Li6 is rare in nature and it does not decay from Li7 which is the common isotope. But Li6 can be bought as a nearly pure isotope. There are more details of course, but ask any nuclear physicist. These results are absolutely preposterous to the extent that intentional deceit is the only possible explanation. A massive shift in isotope balance, as a probability - would be akin to two unrelated people having identical DNA. Jones
