The Wikipedians must hoard /. moderation points for just such an occasion
as this when they can vote the following comment down to a -1 rating:

The Real Criminals: The APS
<http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5818081&cid=48126433> (Score:-1
<http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5818081&cid=48126433#>)
by Baldrson <http://slashdot.org/~Baldrson> (78598)
<http://slashdot.org/~Baldrson> *
<http://slashdot.org/faq/subscriptions.shtml#subscription_other_advantages> on
Sunday October 12, 2014 @04:49PM (#48126433
<http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5818081&cid=48126433>) Homepage
<http://jimbowery.blogspot.com/2014/05/introduction-extinction-of-human-race.html>
 Journal <http://slashdot.org/~Baldrson/journal/>

The controversy over Rossi is a tempest in a teapot. If you want to know
when the real crime was committed, it was by the American Physical Society
at this moment in its Baltimore, MD meeting of May 1, 1989
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wR-AohRWbBo#t=138> [youtube.com]. Agreed,
it was more like a riot with looting than any kind of criminal conspiracy
to commit fraud, but it was vastly more damaging.

As you watch Steven E. Koonin in that video and listen to the obscene
applause of is "colleagues" with the APS, keep in mind that the original
announcement had been at the end of March -- a mere 5 weeks earlier -- and
that the experimental protocol hadn't even been published yet. When it was
published it stated that it took 2 months of electrolytic loading before
the effect *might* occur.

The sole act of scientific integrity among the establishment figures was as
follows:

"Ordinarily, new scientific discoveries are claimed to be consistent and
reproducible; as a result, if the experiments are not complicated, the
discovery can usually be confirmed or disproved in a few months. The claims
of cold fusion, however, are unusual in that even the strongest proponents
of cold fusion assert that the experiments, for unknown reasons, are not
consistent and reproducible at the present time. However, even a single
short but valid cold fusion period would be revolutionary." --Norman Ramsey

Dr. Norman Ramsey Jr.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Foster_Ramsey,_Jr> [wikipedia.org],
Nobel laureate and professor of physics at Harvard University was the only
person on the the 1989 Department of Energy cold fusion review panel to
voice a dissenting opinion. Ramsey insisted on the inclusion of this
preamble as an alternative to his resignation from the panel. The committee
acquiesed because he was its co-chair and the only Nobel laureate on the
committee.

Dr. Ramsey's condition has been fulfilled hundreds of times over the last
quarter century and there has been absolutely no acknowledgement by the APS
of its crime.
--
Seastead this.
<http://jimbowery.blogspot.com/2014/05/introduction-extinction-of-human-race.html>
 [blogspot.com]
Reply to This
<http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5818081&op=Reply&threshold=3&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=48126433>
 Share <http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5818081&cid=48126433#>

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:30 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:

> I went with Oriani's paper with the nauseating context of Nature's
> rejection on the basis that it violates theory, and then followed up with
> Storms's "Status of Cold Fusion (2010)
> <http://coldfusionnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/StormsEstatusofcoa.pdf>
> "
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:57 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Re:The Real Criminals: The APS
>> <http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5818081&cid=48127123> (Score:0
>> <http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5818081&cid=48126433#>)
>> by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12, 2014 @07:21PM (#48127123
>> <http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5818081&cid=48127123>)
>>
>> Its really too bad that APS et al are doubling down on their crime even
>> after decades of experiments that meet Ramsey's criterion.
>>
>> Citation needed.
>> Reply to This
>> <http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5818081&op=Reply&threshold=3&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=48127123>
>>  Parent
>> <http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5818081&threshold=3&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=48127007>
>>  Share <http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5818081&cid=48126433#>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to